Posted on Jan 31, 2014
MSG Inspector General Ncoic
27.5K
187
71
8
8
0
<p><font size="3">Corrective Actions is defined as: Non-punitive actions used as a motivational tool by authorized cadre members to immediately address deficiencies in performance or conduct and to reinforce required standards. </font></p><p><font size="3"></font>&nbsp;</p><p><font size="3">Hazing is defined as: any conduct whereby one military member or employee, regardless of service or rank, unnecessarily causes another military member or employee, regardless of service or rank, to suffer or be exposed to an activity which is cruel, abusive, oppressive or harmful.</font></p><p><font size="3"></font>&nbsp;</p><p><font size="3">As a young private I was "smoked" for anywhere from 5 minutes to several hours.&nbsp;&nbsp;Those actions today will now put you at rist to get fired for Soldier abuse. As a young private I&nbsp;never thought twice about it.&nbsp; I made a mistake and I am now paying the consequences for my actions.&nbsp; I learned quickly that if the stove is hot, not to touch it as it will burn you.&nbsp; Whether my leaders were in the right or wrong&nbsp;does not matter... Their actions helped to form me as a leader. So the question becomes w</font><font size="3">here do you draw the line?</font></p><p><font size="3"></font>&nbsp;</p><p><font size="3">The Book answer states that&nbsp;p<font size="3">hysical exercise can be used&nbsp;for corrective action. Requiring Soldiers to perform a reasonable number of repetitions of authorized physical exercises </font><b><font size="3" face="Times New Roman,Times New Roman"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman,Times New Roman">IAW&nbsp;TC 3-22.20 </font></font></b><font size="3" face="Times New Roman,Times New Roman"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman,Times New Roman"></font></font><font size="3">as a motivational tool is permitted for corrective action. However, consideration must be given to the exercises, repetitions, and total number of times each day that exercise is used for corrective action to limit the potential for overtraining and injuries.</font></font></p><p><font size="3"></font>&nbsp;</p><p><font size="3">We realize that we must follow the orders of those appointed over us.&nbsp; Their guidelines will layout what the right answer for that unit will be. </font></p><p><font size="3"></font>&nbsp;</p><p><font size="3">My question to you is what is acceptable in your opinion for the use of physical exercise in the use of corrective actions?&nbsp; And where do we cross the line and it becomes hazing?</font></p>
Posted in these groups: 73128deb Hazing
Avatar feed
Responses: 16
SFC James Baber
12
12
0
<p>SFC W.</p><p><br></p><p>I think the changes that have come about and put in writing is more about politics than about right and wrong, many of us to include yourself went through what is now called abuse, but were not any worse for wear for what we went through. In actuality it is what instilled the discipline, respect and values in those of us that continued to fulfill our career and many that are still serving today.</p><p><br></p><p>But because of the PC world of today and probably since about the late 90s/early 2000s the quality of disciplined, honest, integrity oriented Soldiers have been very minimal as most are more worried about what is in it for them, than about doing their jobs and service to country. That is the reason we have had much more issues with sexual assaults, thefts, embezzlements, homicides, drug and alcohol related incidents than we ever did in the Army of the early 90s and before.</p><p><br></p><p>Just my personal opinion and experience of 27 years of military service.</p>
(12)
Comment
(0)
SFC James Baber
SFC James Baber
>1 y

SSG Small,


I agree that we all have varied experiences and deployments, I also think that many of us have had different learning curves throughout our careers as well, I have talked with SGT Riser extensively and we have understood that we had misunderstood what each other was trying to get across in a limited ability forum discussion. Believe me, we all know SF and Infantry side of the house are completely different types of environments compared to many standard garrison type MOSs, but all serve a purpose and fulfill the needs of the Army, so we must all learn to adapt to each others abilities and job contributions and accept them for what they give to us all in the big picture of our service to country.


I agree the discussion went into far left field for what the original topic was based on, but we all have gotten it back to center where it belongs, so enjoy your weekend and have a great week.

(4)
Reply
(0)
CW3 Electronic Systems Maintenance Tech, S4
CW3 (Join to see)
>1 y

WOW all I can say is wow to this whole thread, are the problems in ALL ranks in the Army. Yes, some are due to generations, some are due to untouchable mentality and some are due to changes in how we rais young NCO's and LT's. 

 

I have heard many things from the old guard, when I was in BNCOC after two deployments and one already planned, the instructors hiding in the school house were crying that branch told them to get ready to swap with units that have already seen 2-3 rotations. Oh they were yelling the army can't do that to me not at 20 years.  I was absolutly pissed that after their time of taking the army for years of no war, when the army says to fulfill their duty they want to run. But at the same time there are young soldiers that are still joining during war that are surprised when they have to deploy. Next thing you know they go from I will join an army at war to "I'm a conscientious objector" so the this generatiion that joined knowing they were in war thought i'll be good.

 

I think some of the problems we will see are due to these war babies, not having been in garrison  will bring about a new army life that they don't know and may not know how to deal with.  Back to mowing grass on base, standing guard at gates, KP. Reintroducing the lines of devision between E4 and E5, E5's and Sr NCO's, Jr enlisted and all officers.  12 years of war have made this buddy feeling that never should have been blurred. No before anyone jumps on me, this is not EVERY unit, but far to many.

 

SFC Baber I will be joining you as soon as I reach my 20 - 24.  When you can't make a simple correction at any base, specificly AIT bases without JAG cominc down on you things have cone wrong.    There should be corrective action NJP, maybe physical fitness, or heck some good poking of fun at a mistake. Not hazing which is just for the groups self satisfaction. Soldier looses a key, he carries the bolt cutters extended to cut his lock. He may feel a little embarased but is he hurt, really? Some corrections shouldn't need 4856.

 

This turned out longer than I planned.

(3)
Reply
(0)
SFC James Baber
SFC James Baber
>1 y

Chief,


I agree with you whole heartedly, that was my original point, when we came up it wasn't hazing it was discipline and corrective training, but the PC police have taken small things and blown them out of proportion and labeled it as hazing, now I will be the 1st to admit, some people have taken it to a new level which is over the top, but probably 95% of it was just what it stated corrective training or instilling discipline. We as a military whole have created the environment of the thinking of some of the new breed of NCOs and officers that are afraid to do what they know is right because they don't want "to catch a case," but you then get the NCOs that say I am wrong and am being disrespectful to them by marginalizing their contributions, but they are so bent on claiming that they failed to even pay attention what I said as a whole, that is another part of what proves what I stated, they are so concerned about "what about me," they failed to understand the big picture of it all and the problems that have been caused and the issues we now have that is deteriorating our forces from being overly PC on every little thing. Yes change is good sometimes to correct a major error or problem, but the continuous nitpicking every little individual wish of some small percentage group of PC complaint has diminished what the military's ultimate mission is and was, defend the country and our allies, but we have become to concerned about who's feelings we have hurt because we made them do corrective training of physical activity or pulling barracks guard to correct an infraction on their part.


After 14 years of dual wars, we have to put aside all the PC BS and get back to basics and enforce standards that no one really had any problems with before 9/11 or during the previous decade, but since returning from these 2 wars back to garrison duties, we have all the young NCOs and officers that think we are not being fair to them or the Soldiers by making them enforce what has always been there, but was allowed to get lax because we were fighting 2 wars and they didn't want the extra stress of enforcing the standards while deployed. While it has always been ok to be friendly with your subordinates, it doesn't make for conducive or productive enforcement if you are friends with them or your seniors, it creates the environment where issues will arise and feelings will be hurt when you are made to do something that is right and not what you want, the standards, until we get away from that mentality it is only going to continue and progressively get worse before it gets better and stronger for everyone serving.

(2)
Reply
(0)
CW3 Electronic Systems Maintenance Tech, S4
CW3 (Join to see)
>1 y

SFC


Though this is off the corrections/hazing, some of us have been talking standards and regs. Yes there is a new 670-1, and in that there are very small changes, but the bulk of what is getting so many bent out of shape is really just shedding a light on what has been ignored. STANDARDS.  Now I hate the hands pocket discussion, and I swear this is the first time it was in the black and white. But the majority of what they are taling about are standards no one enforced over the last 10 years, stylish or parade pretty hair do's, tattoos, wearing your uniform right or wrong.  I have seen everything from soldiers without their top's on while outside of their vehicle pumping gas, a soldier in cook whites sagging enough to see the white T under his top above his pants, mixing Pt and ACU's anytime other than PT.  The hardest thing is to walk over and tell them to straighten up. It sucks but that is the right thing. We shouldn't need the SGM patrols once a year (JBLM) to correct soldiers, dam when I came up if you saw SGM you were walking out a little lighter on the collar. Now the young 5-6's drive SGM's to have to make corrections.


Before anyone yells Not all 5-6's are slacking.


For anyone interested pick up that green NCO guide from the military clothing, or Be Know Do form the FM library.  If you can go from front to back and not get knots in your gut then you are better than anyone else. But everyone has an area they can improve, that guide will help you. Be the NCO's the army needs right now and the soldiers deserve, not friends, mentors and leaders.

(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CPL David Levy
9
9
0
It is a shame that things are changing in such a way, that it limits a leaders ability to mold soldiers into fine young men and women. 

When I was in, there was corrective action that looked like hazing, but we were all better for it. Sometimes, its simply tradition and we can tell the stories and be proud to have been on the receiving end, and in time, with promotion, gotten to carry on that tradition and administer the very same corrections to your own soldiers. 

One corrective action I received, was a misunderstanding, because I had not committed any infractions, a Sergeant misunderstood and got the wrong soldiers name, took me out and smoked me with a cinder block.  I basically held it out in the iron chair position.. Try that for 2-3 minutes, the knees go weak and start shacking to the point it looks comical. even I laughed about it for years. 

I do often think about what we could do better to improve soldierization without offending or  creating any backlash. There is a new wave of service members coming into the military that is raised much different than we were (we = older). There is a sense of entitlement and self preservation about the newer generation, that any discipline now, has to be administered through paper only. Before I got out of the military in 2009, I saw soldiers cross their arms, say "NO! I won't do that, you can just write me up and take my rank, I am not doing ....!.....!.... for you"... And so, corrective action was vetoed and an Article 15 administered with extra duty and some cases, loss of rank.. 

Not sure why people felt it better to stand up to the man, instead of doing what was asked of them in the first place.  

I guess I am just an old soul, and like to call myself old school.. But, that way of thinking is obsolete now, and I need to change with the times, adapt, and become a better leader that fits the new regime. 
(9)
Comment
(0)
SFC Infantryman
SFC (Join to see)
>1 y
SPC Levy btw O-H
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Infantryman
8
8
0

This is my personal opinion...I've only been in 5 1/2 years, but in that time I've seen a great change in the way we handle corrective action. In my unit you CANNOT make a Soldier do a physical activity as corrective action. You have to counsel him and that's it.

 

 

No wonder our Soldier's are so weak and disrespectful. They have nothing to fear but a piece of paper that they initial, sign, and date.

 

Soldier's don't remember pieces of paper, they remember pain. Just like when we were in basic training we don't remember that inital counseling, we remember the shark attack, or the smoke session with pro masks on because someone's shoes were out of line. Now if you do that you are getting an Article 15 and kicked out for hazing.

(8)
Comment
(0)
SFC Alfonso Triana
SFC Alfonso Triana
>1 y
I served in Camp Humphreys South Korea, great times.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SPC Team Leader/ Bradley Gunner
SPC (Join to see)
>1 y
"Rock of the Marne" is definitely soft, counselings for everyone, 100% do not agree with my unit's policy
(0)
Reply
(0)
SSG Ait Instructor
SSG (Join to see)
>1 y
I see where the physical aspect of corrective training is useful. If the counselings are done properly  the Soldiers will fill the effect even more so than with physical training. Its called a paper trail which ends in loss of money and time. Every Soldier fells that longer than any amount of physical assertion that they endure.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SFC Infantryman
SFC (Join to see)
>1 y
Paper trails sound great and wonderful, but it a lot more time consuming than smoking a guy for 10 minutes. I'd rather make an on the spot correction for 10 minutes then find a computer, type up a counseling, counsel the Soldier and then put it in his counseling packet, just to start a chapter packet on him a year down the road. It takes ONE counseling to chapter a Soldier, there is this really cool box no one knows about at the bottom of the 4856. Counsel the Soldier for something that is worth while, 30 days do a follow up, if he didn't correct it there is all you need for your chapter packet. If I just want to make an on the spot correction I should by all means be allowed to make that Soldier do physical activity of any variety. Not just what some high up dude that has forgotten what it's like to be a Soldier says is okay.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Avatar feed
Corrective Actions Vs. Hazing
TSgt Aircraft Armament Systems
7
7
0
Lot of interesting points being raised here. But my last two squads have been filled with dum-dums who are in awesome shape. Believe me, making them write an essay that will be corrected for grammar, syntax and spelling, by hand, is a far worse punishment than making them drop for push-ups. My men can do that all day.<div><br></div><div>Tell them to write a four-page essay on Drill and Ceremony as it relates to Daily Duties and Scope and you'd think you'd just sentenced them to death. It all depends on the Soldier, and that's why it takes a thinking individual to be a true leader.</div>
(7)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSG C Ied & Irw Instructor
6
6
0
<p>To be honest I blame the NCO's before me and the NCO Corps now.&nbsp; We overstepped our boundaries, we took it on ourselves to "Punish" instead of training and mentoring.&nbsp; We forgot our true purpose, and as a result our hands are being tied.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>When did we stop mentoring soldiers?&nbsp; When did we decide that they needed to fear their leaders?&nbsp; No soldier should fear his NCO's, he should fear disappointing them, he should fear failure...but never should he fear the man/woman who is charged with making decisions that affect life or death on the battlefield.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Instead of focusing on the "I can't smoke them", maybe we start focusing on mentoring and developing them.&nbsp; Maybe we start instilling an Esprit De Corps that's long been lacking in the Army, maybe we make Soldier's proud to be in their organizations.&nbsp; When you have pride in something, you take care of it....soldiers who have no pride in their unit and the Army are going to care less about how their actions reflect upon it.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p>
(6)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
CW3 Network Architect
6
6
0
"Whether my leades were in the right or wrong does not matter".  That one sentence scares me when uttered by a senior NCO or really any leader.  That says to me it's not about what right looks like, and THAT is the wrong answer.
(6)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
CPT Technician
5
5
0
I have a shop full of people who act like their smartphones are grafted to their hands.  After warning a particular PFC a few times, I instituted a policy whereby if you want to play on your phone you will do so in the "up" position of the V-up.  So far, no one has been dumb enough to test my resolve.
(5)
Comment
(0)
SSG Civil Affairs Nco
SSG (Join to see)
>1 y
Genius Sir. Will use.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SSG Cannon Crew Member
SSG (Join to see)
>1 y
allow them to use their phone in the start position of the windmill. ;+)
(3)
Reply
(0)
SSG General Services Technician And State Vehicle Inspector
SSG (Join to see)
>1 y
Or better yet, have them put their phone down in front of them, they stand at attention, then have them do 8 count push-ups. They can only speak into the phone when they are in the down position of the push-up. :D
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
WO1 Student
3
3
0

8 count push ups. GO.


I posted the paragraph of 7-22 that addresses physical activity as corrective actions all over my Troop AO. Soldiers and NCOs are all aware of exactly what they can do. There are 8 authorized exercises that 7-22 gives you as a tool. Five repetitions per infraction. Take care to avoid overuse of physical activity as to avoid injury.


The previous posts are right about watching your ass these days. I'm currently awaiting my PCS to Fort Rucker for WOCS and am not risking anything.


Use the 5 reps as a "yank the leash" approach. It works.



(3)
Comment
(0)
CPT Battery Commander
CPT (Join to see)
>1 y
This is good advice!
Most of the time, a Soldier doesn't need to be physically exhausted before they will change their attitude. Sometimes "yanking the leash" to give a reminder of who's in charge is enough. Some soldiers are embarrassed to get smoked. It can be useful, when not overused.

I had a Soldier quote the 5-rep rule to me. I told him he was absolutely right...and then began his corrective training with the 8-count push-up, and then proceeded from there. The whole time I was providing his training, I was congratulating him on his knowledge of the regs. He got the hint.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CW2 Geoff Lachance
3
3
0
Wow!  The purpose for military training is to prepare you for the arduous life on the battlefield.  This isn't a nine to five job where you get to pamper yourself to look your best every morning.  It takes a great deal of inner strength to handle all the hardships encountered in combat.  Train to a level so uncomfortable that when in combat you just go with the flow!  As long as they are not breaking bones or cutting off fingers, bringing you to a point of sheer exhaustion will do nothing more than build a mental toughness that can only serve to aid you when you need it most. 
(3)
Comment
(0)
CW2 Geoff Lachance
CW2 Geoff Lachance
>1 y
I know, lets all gather flowers, hold hands and dance and sing!   la la la - laa laa laa - la la la
(2)
Reply
(0)
SPC Armorer
SPC (Join to see)
>1 y
Chief you are the type of leader that I would want to follow into battle. I don't believe in all this soft army crap, we are trained to fight, kill and destroy our enemies. It is up to leaders to not stand for all of these policies that make our military soft. When the military is made soft by easier basic training and more relaxed standards across the board that invites softer soldiers into our ranks and makes rid tougher more hardcore, more motivated, dedicated soldiers want to get out, which overall weakens us as a military. When we go up against a military who trains harder and wants it more they will defeat us. To many soldiers see the Army as what the Army can offer them and do for them and not the other way around. 

"My fellow Americans, ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country." John F Kennedy


(3)
Reply
(0)
CW2 Geoff Lachance
CW2 Geoff Lachance
>1 y
Thanks for the compliment SPC!  I'm old and worn out now and am hoping you and soldiers like you are willing to stay the course.  We need a strong military and even stronger leaders.  Love the JFK quote!
(2)
Reply
(0)
SPC Armorer
SPC (Join to see)
>1 y
I'm probably in for the long haul Chief, don't really have an exit strategy yet so I figure I'll keep on the trail until I figure something out. Besides the Army ain't a bad place to be. A whole lot of cool experiences and people that you would otherwise never get to experience. AATW!
(3)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Maintenance/Transportation Ncoic
3
3
0
Edited >1 y ago
Now it would be considered hazing. When I came in, it was just getting some act right put into you. These days you can't even yell at Soldiers much less smoke them. Hell if you raise your voice a little, its straight to the IG. Then of course the NCO gets in trouble for disciplining that Soldier. People wonder why these new Soldiers act the way they do and don't have respect for anyone. Its because the Military in general has gotten to soft, sensitive, and to politically correct. We have a job to do when we are called to do it. And to be frank, when it comes down to it, that job is to kill people. If you can't handle a "smoke session" or getting "yelled at", how can you be expected to fire a shot much less take one when you battle or your life is on the line?
(3)
Comment
(0)
SSG Civil Affairs Nco
SSG (Join to see)
>1 y

What if the individual is better at shooting, than being a garrison soldier?

 

I have seen this in my time.

(1)
Reply
(0)
SGT Maintenance/Transportation Ncoic
SGT (Join to see)
>1 y

SSG, I have seen this many times as well. While thats not all and all a bad thing, the Army is about the "total Soldier concept". If the one thing a Soldier is great at is marksmanship, then it is our job as leaders and NCO's to shape that Soldier into a "total Soldier". Thats is why we are supposed to teach, train, and mentor so that Soldiers don't have a "Garrison" or "Deployed" mindset. With that being said, I am a realist. I understand that there are people out there who just can't conform to either of those enviroments. That person may be the most outstanding person in Garrison, but put them in a warzone and they are lost, and vise versa.

(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close