Posted on Feb 14, 2017
Are square-toed Oxford shoes technically authorized?
11.1K
28
16
2
2
0
Saw a lot of debate on US Army WTF Moments over this photo, but as usual, healthy debate was ruined by memes. Obviously, his pants are ill-fitting, but the square-toes is what I'm curious about.
Posted in these groups: 
Dress Uniform
DA Pam 670-1
Dress Uniform DA Pam 670-1
Posted 8 y ago
Responses: 12
4
4
0
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxford_shoe
The answer is in the definition of "Oxford Shoe". Although not stated, Oxfords have a toe cap. The shoe above does not. This is some deep research!
The answer is in the definition of "Oxford Shoe". Although not stated, Oxfords have a toe cap. The shoe above does not. This is some deep research!
An Oxford shoe is characterized by shoelace eyelets tabs that are attached under the vamp,[1] a feature termed "closed lacing".[2] This contrasts with Derbys, or Blüchers, which have shoelace eyelets attached to the top of the vamp. Originally, Oxfords were plain, formal shoes, made of leather but they evolved into a range of styles suitable for both formal, uniform, and casual wear. Based on function and the dictates of fashion, Oxfords are...
(4)
(0)
SPC (Join to see)
I'm starting to think a book should be written that can be applied to the AR and PAM because every so often there's a question like this that an SM like yourself helps find the answer to MSG.
That or we need to re-write the regulation to make clear and perfect sense.
That or we need to re-write the regulation to make clear and perfect sense.
(0)
(0)
Good question as DA Pam 670-1 does not designate rounded, pointed, or squared.
(4)
(0)
SGT (Join to see)
Yeah, that's where I was lost. They have to be Oxford, but Oxford shoes are not defined by the toe.
(3)
(0)
3
3
0
As a 1SG I would not allow it as it violates the concept of uniformity. I'm fairly sure my CSM would back me up on that, we aren't about special snowflakes in the military.
(3)
(0)
CW4 Keith Dolliver
I agree that the square toe is not authorized, but I don't agree with your rationale because "it violates the concept of uniformity". There are lots of things in the reg that allow for variation; e.g. Boots, PT shoes, white button-down shirt (for blues), just to name a few. We need to make decisions and enforce policy based on the regulations not just because it's something we're unfamiliar with and haven't seen before.
(4)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google