Posted on Sep 13, 2015
SFC G 1 Ncoic
96.7K
137
58
4
4
0
Perspective from those elite few who have been to both the Jumpmaster and Pathfinder Courses, honestly which did you find required more focus? More difficult?
Avatar feed
Responses: 26
SFC Infantryman
15
15
0
As one who not only passed both courses, but later taught them, I feel they are equally tough. Pathfinder harder academic wise, jumpmaster harder physically (the sequence, being the biggest part of course).
(15)
Comment
(0)
SFC Michael Watkins, MPA/EM, CHPP, CJE
SFC Michael Watkins, MPA/EM, CHPP, CJE
>1 y
HOOOO rah to that.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Todd Lysfjord
12
12
0
Jumpmaster was more difficult for me...I thought Pathfinder was a breeze but I'm pretty good at math so I didn't stress like some of the others when it came to those types of written tests. Both fun schools though...
(12)
Comment
(0)
SSG Todd Lysfjord
SSG Todd Lysfjord
9 y
MSG (Join to see) - Me too...that was far from fun.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SSG Supply Sergeant (S4)
SSG (Join to see)
>1 y
CARP was the hardest for me. It wasn't that the math was hard is was memorizing the charts.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SSgt Joint Terminal Attack Controller (Jtac)
SSgt (Join to see)
>1 y
I don't buy it anytime somebody says it was a breeze. I think you're full of it.
(0)
Reply
(0)
CW3 Property Book Officer (Pbo)
CW3 (Join to see)
>1 y
I wouldn't say it was a breeze but I studied relatively hard and passed, don't have to memorize the carp charts anymore which was good
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
1px xxx
Suspended Profile
I'd do Jumpmaster first. Get an introduction to CARP. Besides, being a JM is a huge responsibility that I believe you would excel at. Then onto Pathfinder. The graduate course of both JM and Air Assault.

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close