Posted on Nov 25, 2024
How can I determine if someone is authorized to wear the SSI MOHC from our former unit?
1.29K
8
8
2
2
0
SSI-MOHC TDY GWOT-EM ?
QFTG: A former soldier of mine, recently received information/ guidance that they're now authorized to wear the SSI MOHC from our former unit. Based on the following criteria:
-1610 (TDY ISO/ detailed location etc.)
-IDP
-Awarded GWOT-EM
-ISO a named OP.
I countered with the latest AR 670-1 pg 43-44 reference. But, him and I have been told yes( bc aforementioned ) no (no czte) and not sure. Wondering if anyone in the group has had similar experiences and or input to a way ahead. Thanks for any and all feedback.
QFTG: A former soldier of mine, recently received information/ guidance that they're now authorized to wear the SSI MOHC from our former unit. Based on the following criteria:
-1610 (TDY ISO/ detailed location etc.)
-IDP
-Awarded GWOT-EM
-ISO a named OP.
I countered with the latest AR 670-1 pg 43-44 reference. But, him and I have been told yes( bc aforementioned ) no (no czte) and not sure. Wondering if anyone in the group has had similar experiences and or input to a way ahead. Thanks for any and all feedback.
Posted in these groups: 
TDY
IDP (Imminent Danger Pay)
TDY IDP (Imminent Danger Pay)
Posted 3 d ago
Responses: 1
2
2
0
The correct answer is still AR 670-1. ch 21-18.
Specifically c. (20):"Future operations: Combatant commanders may request wear of the SSI – MOHC for future areas of operation designated and approved by the CSA."
If your deployment is not listed there, then the GCC must submit it for CSA approval.
If the aforementioned guidance included that CSA approval, then yes.
If not, then no.
Specifically c. (20):"Future operations: Combatant commanders may request wear of the SSI – MOHC for future areas of operation designated and approved by the CSA."
If your deployment is not listed there, then the GCC must submit it for CSA approval.
If the aforementioned guidance included that CSA approval, then yes.
If not, then no.
(2)
(0)
CW2 (Join to see)
I see, so only countries listed in AR for the designated operation are eligible for SSI Mohc. Which does not include countries that sub operations take place in? Appreciate all and any feedback!
(1)
(0)
SGM (Join to see)
CW2 (Join to see) - That is correct.
For what it's worth, we have some Soldiers on TCS orders in direct support of all the main operations going on today, and they are "deployed" to Maryland, Georgia and southern California...
For what it's worth, we have some Soldiers on TCS orders in direct support of all the main operations going on today, and they are "deployed" to Maryland, Georgia and southern California...
(1)
(0)
COL Randall C.
SGM (Join to see) - However, for full context (since the discussion is about SSI-MOHC), I don't think you're suggesting that they would be eligible based on their CONUS deployment, correct?
(0)
(0)
SGM (Join to see)
COL Randall C. - Not suggesting that at all, just pointing out the difference between supporting the operation anywhere else vs supporting the operation AND being in a country that's authorized SSI-MOHC.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google