Posted on Aug 2, 2015
Should Pell Grants for college education be available to our incarcerated citizens?
3.18K
43
20
3
3
0
http://www.npr.org/sections/ed/2015/07/31/428148089/the-plan-to-give-pell-grants-to-prisoners?sc=17&f=1001
Education Secretary Arne Duncan and Attorney General Loretta Lynch made a rare joint appearance on Friday — in prison.
They visited a state-run facility in Jessup, Md., to announce a new plan meant to help some of the 700,000 inmates who are released each year.
It's a pilot program to give prisoners access to federal Pell Grants that would pay for college classes behind bars.
"The cost-benefit of this does not take a math genius to figure out," Duncan said. "We lock folks up here, $35-40,000 every single year. A Pell Grant is less than $6,000 each year."
Here's a bit more math that Duncan uses to make his case: Of those 700,000 prisoners released each year, more than 40 percent will be back behind bars within three years.
Duncan's plan involves persuading colleges and universities to run classes inside prison and giving prisoners Pell Grants to help pay for it all. The pilot will last roughly five years and focus on prisoners due to be released in that time. Many other details have yet to be worked out, including what colleges and prisons will participate and how many prisoners will benefit.
"We think this is a small, small investment that will pay extraordinary dividends," Duncan said. "Not just financially. But in terms of making our streets and our community safer."
Because this is — officially — an experiment, the express purpose is to gather data. But there's already some pretty strong data.
"We are at the point where the debate no longer should be about whether or not prison education is effective. Clearly, we have more than demonstrated that," says Lois Davis, lead author of an influential Rand Corp. study. "We estimate that for every dollar invested in prison education programs, this saves taxpayers on average $5."
Davis found that, when an inmate takes college classes, he's 16 percent less likely to return to prison. In her words — "a very dramatic reduction."
But not everyone's convinced.
"It's an affront to taxpayers and parents," says U.S. Rep. Chris Collins.
Earlier this week, the New York Republican introduced a bill in the House that would block Duncan's plan. Collins isn't necessarily arguing with the data. He just doesn't think taxpayers should have to pay for it.
"There is a limited pot of money, which means that the Pell Grant is not going to a middle-class family struggling to pay tuition," Collins says.
Though, technically, anyone who meets the grant criteria and applies will get help, Collins insists "it's still monies that the taxpayers are providing. Monies that could be better spent in other areas."
Two decades ago, Congress voted to cut off access to Pell Grants for state and federal prisoners. Which is why Secretary Duncan's plan — allowed by a separate law — is just a small-scale experiment for research purposes.
As for his hopes that Congress will rollback the ban entirely?
"Congress, you know, doesn't do much these days, unfortunately," Duncan said. "We can't wait on Congress."
Meanwhile, Collins' bill to stop the new program has gone to committee, where it's hard to know what — if anything — will come of it.
Education Secretary Arne Duncan and Attorney General Loretta Lynch made a rare joint appearance on Friday — in prison.
They visited a state-run facility in Jessup, Md., to announce a new plan meant to help some of the 700,000 inmates who are released each year.
It's a pilot program to give prisoners access to federal Pell Grants that would pay for college classes behind bars.
"The cost-benefit of this does not take a math genius to figure out," Duncan said. "We lock folks up here, $35-40,000 every single year. A Pell Grant is less than $6,000 each year."
Here's a bit more math that Duncan uses to make his case: Of those 700,000 prisoners released each year, more than 40 percent will be back behind bars within three years.
Duncan's plan involves persuading colleges and universities to run classes inside prison and giving prisoners Pell Grants to help pay for it all. The pilot will last roughly five years and focus on prisoners due to be released in that time. Many other details have yet to be worked out, including what colleges and prisons will participate and how many prisoners will benefit.
"We think this is a small, small investment that will pay extraordinary dividends," Duncan said. "Not just financially. But in terms of making our streets and our community safer."
Because this is — officially — an experiment, the express purpose is to gather data. But there's already some pretty strong data.
"We are at the point where the debate no longer should be about whether or not prison education is effective. Clearly, we have more than demonstrated that," says Lois Davis, lead author of an influential Rand Corp. study. "We estimate that for every dollar invested in prison education programs, this saves taxpayers on average $5."
Davis found that, when an inmate takes college classes, he's 16 percent less likely to return to prison. In her words — "a very dramatic reduction."
But not everyone's convinced.
"It's an affront to taxpayers and parents," says U.S. Rep. Chris Collins.
Earlier this week, the New York Republican introduced a bill in the House that would block Duncan's plan. Collins isn't necessarily arguing with the data. He just doesn't think taxpayers should have to pay for it.
"There is a limited pot of money, which means that the Pell Grant is not going to a middle-class family struggling to pay tuition," Collins says.
Though, technically, anyone who meets the grant criteria and applies will get help, Collins insists "it's still monies that the taxpayers are providing. Monies that could be better spent in other areas."
Two decades ago, Congress voted to cut off access to Pell Grants for state and federal prisoners. Which is why Secretary Duncan's plan — allowed by a separate law — is just a small-scale experiment for research purposes.
As for his hopes that Congress will rollback the ban entirely?
"Congress, you know, doesn't do much these days, unfortunately," Duncan said. "We can't wait on Congress."
Meanwhile, Collins' bill to stop the new program has gone to committee, where it's hard to know what — if anything — will come of it.
Posted in these groups: 
College
College
Edited >1 y ago
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 8
I personally would rather see the money go to helping Veterans who are trying to go back to school and transition into civilian life vs. convicted felons.
I also think that with so many budget cuts, these programs like this providing additional monies should be placed on hold until there is a better idea of the budget because right now, it's like writing a bad check. Where's the funding going to come from. I'm a federal worker who is looking at a possible furlough again. There's already rumblings about sequestration on the Hill. Absolutely not.
I also think that with so many budget cuts, these programs like this providing additional monies should be placed on hold until there is a better idea of the budget because right now, it's like writing a bad check. Where's the funding going to come from. I'm a federal worker who is looking at a possible furlough again. There's already rumblings about sequestration on the Hill. Absolutely not.
(2)
(0)
2
2
0
Why not issue a 9mm when the get out to protect our streets. What is wrong with our country, that we even think this way? When you go to jail, do not pass go. You loose privileges, you are suppose feel hurt, pain, until you feel some kind of remorse, then a parole board will figure it out. if you complete your sentence, then earn the privilege back. No one ever said prison is "a walk in the park". Again, it is suppose to hurt, that's why people get sent there. God help me, I'm ranting. i think everyone knows what I'm saying...NO, NO, NO and hell NO. Don't give prisoners a Pell Grant.
(2)
(0)
SMSgt Tony Barnes
Prison is to be rehabilitative...not a hockey penalty box. The question is what is wrong with you that you think that way? A person with education is less likely to engage in crime.
(0)
(0)
CPT (Join to see)
One of my majors was criminal justice, there are three models for incarceration, one is rehabilitation and another is detention only with no effort for rehabilitation. Thank you, SMSgt Tony Barnes for your comments, however, I don"t think there is anything wrong with me. You take the rehabilitation road and i'll take the "throw them in jail and throw away the key" road.
(0)
(0)
SMSgt Tony Barnes
CPT Thomas R. Isaacs I prefer they not be a total strain on my taxpayer dollars. I would rather invest in them...the ROI is worth it.
(1)
(0)
CPT (Join to see)
I respect you view, I also, believe at this time in our history, that our tax dollars can be used for better programs. after some "soul searching", rehab prisons our still going to be around after i'm long gone, I don't agree with them, but I'm me. If we can't use the Pell Grants for high school kids, or the service members that need help and the money is just sitting around, I'll concede, and let's try it for the 5 year trail period :)
(0)
(0)
2
2
0
I think it would be helpful to draw down on the amount of incarcerated citizens, however there should be a strict screening process on individuals to make sure that the funds are being properly used. I also feel in my personal opinion that individuals who fall under the age limit for the pull grant and who do not qualify for the program should be given the priority to apply before convicts. My only question is we are having so many budget cutbacks that even our outgoing Chief of Staff for the Army has said we are fine drastically behind on the curb and leaving ourselves vulnerable, is giving convicts the Pell Grant really a priority over our nation security with the continuous sequestration?
(2)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google