3
3
0
<font color="#000000" size="3" face="Times New Roman">
</font><p style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000" size="3" face="Calibri">Burning CD's is not unrealistic but way behind the curve.
The Army needs to come out of 1992 and create a credentialed CAC synched USB system,
if not for everyone, for the chain of command, training rooms, armorers, and
supply sergeants. You can encrypt the drives and require the SM to log in to
use them. Especially since we are going into garrison mode, paperwork and
property are going to become the big push. And with the Army wanting to go
completely digital this only makes since.</font></p><font color="#000000" size="3" face="Times New Roman">
</font>
</font><p style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000" size="3" face="Calibri">Burning CD's is not unrealistic but way behind the curve.
The Army needs to come out of 1992 and create a credentialed CAC synched USB system,
if not for everyone, for the chain of command, training rooms, armorers, and
supply sergeants. You can encrypt the drives and require the SM to log in to
use them. Especially since we are going into garrison mode, paperwork and
property are going to become the big push. And with the Army wanting to go
completely digital this only makes since.</font></p><font color="#000000" size="3" face="Times New Roman">
</font>
OPSEC
Paperwork
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 6
2
2
0
I thought the USB prohibition was related to the autorun.inf vulnerability and the military was slow to realize the problem had been patched.
Removable storage in general should be avoided. Cloud storage through organizational servers or AKO cloud is probably the way to go. Our focus should be to ensure greater connectivity of our devices.
Removable storage in general should be avoided. Cloud storage through organizational servers or AKO cloud is probably the way to go. Our focus should be to ensure greater connectivity of our devices.
(2)
(0)
SFC (Join to see)
It was, DoD cleared USB drives for further use. DA said no. In retrospect, our policies weren't adhered to much which created a huge vulnerability. Cloud storage is fine, almost every place you go to has access to something of the sort. I foresee that removable media policies won't allow usb anytime in the near future. The vulnerabilities are greater than the assets gained. Then again, you could always apply for an exception to policy if you really think you need to use it.
(1)
(0)
SGT (Join to see)
Agreed, SFC (Join to see) . Allowing USB devices just makes electronic espionage that much easier. I don't like creating weaknesses that don't need to be made.
(0)
(0)
1
1
0
I like this thinking. I think that the whole reason the USB drives have been disabled is due to abuse and misuse of computer systems. Realistically, burning to a CD is not much different, it still allows a Soldier to extract information. If the CD is burned from a home computer, it also provides an opportunity to transfer a virus from the home computer through the CD/DVD. I think your idea of CAC enabled encryption is a good idea, and I could see this not requiring any additional equipment. The only concern I have is that people will lose the USB drives.
(1)
(0)
SSG (Join to see)
I remember at one point we received some type of password protected USB this was in 2008
(0)
(0)
0
0
0
That's how a battalion S-1 shop operates everything is on a large share drive and they go into the saved files to print out the forms needed, But I do see where you are coming from as far as a company needing its own share drive to have company completed and saved forms. That would certainly make things run a whole lot smoother, because then you just scan a file to the database and it would he there as you need it.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google