3
3
0
From: Navy Times
Fancy dinners, subsidized shopping sprees and elaborate model ships: These are the ploys "Fat" Leonard Francis used to curry favor with senior Navy leaders on the carrier Reagan on its 2006 cruise in Asia.
Navy Secretary Ray Mabus accused Rear Adms. Mike Miller, Terry Kraft and David Pimpo of "showing very poor judgement and leadership regarding [their] relationship with Mr. Leonard Francis, the president of Glenn Defense Marine Asia," according to letters of censure issued in February and obtained by Navy Times on Friday through a Freedom of Information Act request.
Miller was the strike group commander, Kraft the carrier's commanding officer, and Pimpo the ship's supply officer on the deployment.
The revelations are the latest in a scandal that has rocked the Navy, with now five admirals tied to Francis and GDMA, the port servicing contractor at the center of a wide-ranging bribery investigation by the Justice Department. The expanding bribery scandal has implicated active duty officers and sailors and a parade of allegations of the high-level sketchy dealings with the Malaysian contractor for the better part of a decade.
The Navy disclosed the retirement grade determinations for the admirals, a judgment of the last paygrade at which they served honorably. Miller retires as a vice admiral after 41 years of service; Kraft retires as a two-star after 34 years, and Pimpo retires as a captain at 30 years. The Navy was referred the allegations by the Justice Department, who declined to pursue charges for reasons believed to include the fact these charges fell beyond the statute of limitations.
In the case of the censured admirals, Francis threw the Reagan's senior leaders lavish dinner parties at world-class restaurants such as Petrus in Hong Kong and Suisse Chalet in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. The officers paid $50 a head for dinner and cigars valued at nearly $800, according to the letters.
Francis also gifted Miller and Pimpo ship models valued at more than $800 each, but they paid well below that rate for them. Miller was cited for receiving a $870 model of the Reagan, but paid only $500 for the tiny version of his flagship.
Of the three, Pimpo received the harshest criticism from Mabus. Mabus cited Pimpo's "repeated and increasingly personal contact" with Leonard and accused him of "repeatedly paying Mr. Francis for personal expenses at a rate far below the market value of the items and services which were provided."
Pimpo also used Francis to set up a tour of Hong Kong and secure a nice hotel room for him, a service for which he did not pay and fell outside the scope of GDMA's contract with the Navy, Mabus said.
Miller is said to have sent an email to Francis before his 7th Fleet deployment stating that he was looking forward to "renewing" his friendship with the contractor, then subsequently received gifts from Francis, for which Miller underpaid. A year ago, Miller turned over the prestigious superintendent post at the Naval Academy, but has been held on active-duty pending the results of these charges and has been paid as an O-8 since.
Kraft is similarly accused of attending the dinner parties and underpaying.
Francis in January pleaded guilty to charges of bribery, conspiracy to commit bribery and conspiracy to defraud the United States. As the head of husbanding firm Glenn Defense Marine Asia, Francis is accused of leading at least a decade-long scheme to over-bill the Navy for ships pulling into ports across the Pacific, and plied senior officers with gifts, prostitutes, parties and golf.
Kraft, Miller and Pimpo bring the number of admirals implicated in the Fat Leonard affair to five, but Navy Times' sister publication Defense News reported Feb. 8 that nearly three dozen admirals are under federal investigation for ties to GDMA.
Kraft, Miller and Pimpo did not respond to emails seeking comment by press time Saturday.
The first two names to be released publicly were Vice Adm. Ted Branch, director of Naval Intelligence, and his deputy, Rear Adm. Bruce Loveless. Both have had their security clearances suspended for 20 months but remain in their positions.
Branch is under suspicion for receiving a gift from Leonard during his time as CO of the carrier Nimitz in 2005.
The three rebuked officers from the 2006 deployment of Reagan suggests prosecutors may be working their way through the carriers that deployed to 7th Fleet over the past decade searching for more dubious relationships.
http://www.navytimes.com/story/military/2015/07/18/secnav-mabus-miller-kraft-pimpo/30340729/
Fancy dinners, subsidized shopping sprees and elaborate model ships: These are the ploys "Fat" Leonard Francis used to curry favor with senior Navy leaders on the carrier Reagan on its 2006 cruise in Asia.
Navy Secretary Ray Mabus accused Rear Adms. Mike Miller, Terry Kraft and David Pimpo of "showing very poor judgement and leadership regarding [their] relationship with Mr. Leonard Francis, the president of Glenn Defense Marine Asia," according to letters of censure issued in February and obtained by Navy Times on Friday through a Freedom of Information Act request.
Miller was the strike group commander, Kraft the carrier's commanding officer, and Pimpo the ship's supply officer on the deployment.
The revelations are the latest in a scandal that has rocked the Navy, with now five admirals tied to Francis and GDMA, the port servicing contractor at the center of a wide-ranging bribery investigation by the Justice Department. The expanding bribery scandal has implicated active duty officers and sailors and a parade of allegations of the high-level sketchy dealings with the Malaysian contractor for the better part of a decade.
The Navy disclosed the retirement grade determinations for the admirals, a judgment of the last paygrade at which they served honorably. Miller retires as a vice admiral after 41 years of service; Kraft retires as a two-star after 34 years, and Pimpo retires as a captain at 30 years. The Navy was referred the allegations by the Justice Department, who declined to pursue charges for reasons believed to include the fact these charges fell beyond the statute of limitations.
In the case of the censured admirals, Francis threw the Reagan's senior leaders lavish dinner parties at world-class restaurants such as Petrus in Hong Kong and Suisse Chalet in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. The officers paid $50 a head for dinner and cigars valued at nearly $800, according to the letters.
Francis also gifted Miller and Pimpo ship models valued at more than $800 each, but they paid well below that rate for them. Miller was cited for receiving a $870 model of the Reagan, but paid only $500 for the tiny version of his flagship.
Of the three, Pimpo received the harshest criticism from Mabus. Mabus cited Pimpo's "repeated and increasingly personal contact" with Leonard and accused him of "repeatedly paying Mr. Francis for personal expenses at a rate far below the market value of the items and services which were provided."
Pimpo also used Francis to set up a tour of Hong Kong and secure a nice hotel room for him, a service for which he did not pay and fell outside the scope of GDMA's contract with the Navy, Mabus said.
Miller is said to have sent an email to Francis before his 7th Fleet deployment stating that he was looking forward to "renewing" his friendship with the contractor, then subsequently received gifts from Francis, for which Miller underpaid. A year ago, Miller turned over the prestigious superintendent post at the Naval Academy, but has been held on active-duty pending the results of these charges and has been paid as an O-8 since.
Kraft is similarly accused of attending the dinner parties and underpaying.
Francis in January pleaded guilty to charges of bribery, conspiracy to commit bribery and conspiracy to defraud the United States. As the head of husbanding firm Glenn Defense Marine Asia, Francis is accused of leading at least a decade-long scheme to over-bill the Navy for ships pulling into ports across the Pacific, and plied senior officers with gifts, prostitutes, parties and golf.
Kraft, Miller and Pimpo bring the number of admirals implicated in the Fat Leonard affair to five, but Navy Times' sister publication Defense News reported Feb. 8 that nearly three dozen admirals are under federal investigation for ties to GDMA.
Kraft, Miller and Pimpo did not respond to emails seeking comment by press time Saturday.
The first two names to be released publicly were Vice Adm. Ted Branch, director of Naval Intelligence, and his deputy, Rear Adm. Bruce Loveless. Both have had their security clearances suspended for 20 months but remain in their positions.
Branch is under suspicion for receiving a gift from Leonard during his time as CO of the carrier Nimitz in 2005.
The three rebuked officers from the 2006 deployment of Reagan suggests prosecutors may be working their way through the carriers that deployed to 7th Fleet over the past decade searching for more dubious relationships.
http://www.navytimes.com/story/military/2015/07/18/secnav-mabus-miller-kraft-pimpo/30340729/
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 10
Wow, What did these gentlemen think they were...Congressmen? Senators? Governors? Cabinet Members? Presidents? Only members of the executive branch can accept this kind of treatment without consequences.
(5)
(0)
MSgt James Mullis
Cpl Gary Rowe - Correct. However, that only applies to gifts from "foreign governments", not corporations or private citizens. Any gift not from a foreign government official is considered a domestic gift. Domestic gifts to the President and/or First Lady may be disposed of in any manner the President and First Lady wish. If they want to keep a domestic gift, they do not have to purchase it from the Government. The only thing they have to do is list all gifts valued over $100 on an annual report.
(1)
(0)
It's inexcusable and it seems they knew what they were doing was wrong.
I've seen mention several times of the model ship that $500 was paid for but valued at $870. I'd like to see a little bit more info on that since those amounts would actually lead me to believe the Admiral may have thought he paid a legitimate amount. Obviously doesn't excuse anything else he did and shouldn't change the outcome.
I've seen mention several times of the model ship that $500 was paid for but valued at $870. I'd like to see a little bit more info on that since those amounts would actually lead me to believe the Admiral may have thought he paid a legitimate amount. Obviously doesn't excuse anything else he did and shouldn't change the outcome.
(5)
(0)
PO3 William O'Rourke
Good point! What does a model ship cost in Hong Kong? I've bought items in the market on liberty that were much cheaper than they would be in the U.S. After all, what does Walmart pay for those goods coming from China?
(1)
(0)
Why is it SOOOOOO DIFFICULT to do the RIGHT THING as a Flag Officer?? OLD NEWS in the Army http://archive.armytimes.com/article/20121113/NEWS/211130305/4-star-who-headed-AFRICOM-demoted
(3)
(0)
LCDR (Join to see)
I actually posted this a few days ago as well, but yeah it's disgusting
edit: Looks like this is an update :)
edit: Looks like this is an update :)
(2)
(0)
CPO Melvin Reomales
We no longer have Navy leaders made of steel disclipline but political correctness and crooked thoughts.
(1)
(0)
Read This Next