5
5
0
I've had several topics deleted on subjects ranging from Liberals to Officers because people were offended, as cultural marxists tend to be when confronted. Yet, there is offensive content against christians all over the place. Has anyone else had this issue?
Posted in these groups: 
RallyPoint
RallyPoint
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 8
4
4
0
SSG Kevin McCulley I've never had it happen on RallyPoint. I make sure that try to follow the rules of engagement as closely as possible when making posting a discussion or making a reply. I try to be very respectful in my replies and discussions. If something is said that I don't like or there is a post I have no feedback for or I don't know the subject I prefessionally move on and avoid any type of confrontation!
RallyPoint Answers and Discussion Guidelines
Last Updated: Jun 12, 2015 10:48AM EDT
RallyPoint Answers and Discussion is a forum for the community to engage and to learn. Please follow the following basic rules.
DO
1. Be professional, respectful and constructive
2. Post only things that can be seen by the public
3. Include details in your questions and in your responses to others
4. Create posts that ask a question or spark discussion around a topic
DO NOT
1. Do NOT post anything that is marketing a service, a business, a personal event, or can otherwise be interpreted as promotional
2. Do NOT post asking about finding members of an old unit or deployment. You should instead find them directly through our Advanced Search
3. Do NOT post anything that is not of interest to the general RallyPoint community
4. Do NOT post about specific employment opportunities to “All of RallyPoint”.
Information about formal job postings can be found here:
You need to review RallyPoint Reg 3-1 Dated 9 Dec 2014. Pay particular attention the following:
9-3 Enforcement
2- 3- and 4-Star Member Administrators have the permissions to edit tags. Chapter 10: Responses and Comments
10-1 Purpose
a. The purpose of responding to a question is to add insight, opinion or details that pertain to the question.
b. Personal beliefs and experiences are welcome in the response portion of Answers.
10-2 Appropriate Responses and Comments
a. Responses will be constructive and pertinent to question asked. b. Responses are to be professional and respectful. c. Responses will add to the conversation or answer the question asked. d. Responses should be elaborate enough to warrant their presence. “Yes,” “no” or similar trivial answers do not promote discussion.
10-3 Inappropriate Responses and Comments
a. Personal attacks on question poster or other members if the RallyPoint community. Debate is encouraged, but it should remain professional.
RP 3-1 ! 09 December 2014
b. Responses that do not add to and promote conversation. c. Responses that consist solely not be “yes,” “no” or similar answer. d. Responses that include disrespectful, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, or prejudice language.
10-4 Enforcement
a. 2- 3- and 4-Star Member Administrators have the permissions to remove inappropriate responses and comments.
b. All members can report a member for posting inappropriate comments or responses by clicking the blue flag on their profile page. Provide as many details as possible, including what comments you are reporting and a link to the discussion if possible.
RallyPoint Answers and Discussion Guidelines
Last Updated: Jun 12, 2015 10:48AM EDT
RallyPoint Answers and Discussion is a forum for the community to engage and to learn. Please follow the following basic rules.
DO
1. Be professional, respectful and constructive
2. Post only things that can be seen by the public
3. Include details in your questions and in your responses to others
4. Create posts that ask a question or spark discussion around a topic
DO NOT
1. Do NOT post anything that is marketing a service, a business, a personal event, or can otherwise be interpreted as promotional
2. Do NOT post asking about finding members of an old unit or deployment. You should instead find them directly through our Advanced Search
3. Do NOT post anything that is not of interest to the general RallyPoint community
4. Do NOT post about specific employment opportunities to “All of RallyPoint”.
Information about formal job postings can be found here:
You need to review RallyPoint Reg 3-1 Dated 9 Dec 2014. Pay particular attention the following:
9-3 Enforcement
2- 3- and 4-Star Member Administrators have the permissions to edit tags. Chapter 10: Responses and Comments
10-1 Purpose
a. The purpose of responding to a question is to add insight, opinion or details that pertain to the question.
b. Personal beliefs and experiences are welcome in the response portion of Answers.
10-2 Appropriate Responses and Comments
a. Responses will be constructive and pertinent to question asked. b. Responses are to be professional and respectful. c. Responses will add to the conversation or answer the question asked. d. Responses should be elaborate enough to warrant their presence. “Yes,” “no” or similar trivial answers do not promote discussion.
10-3 Inappropriate Responses and Comments
a. Personal attacks on question poster or other members if the RallyPoint community. Debate is encouraged, but it should remain professional.
RP 3-1 ! 09 December 2014
b. Responses that do not add to and promote conversation. c. Responses that consist solely not be “yes,” “no” or similar answer. d. Responses that include disrespectful, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, or prejudice language.
10-4 Enforcement
a. 2- 3- and 4-Star Member Administrators have the permissions to remove inappropriate responses and comments.
b. All members can report a member for posting inappropriate comments or responses by clicking the blue flag on their profile page. Provide as many details as possible, including what comments you are reporting and a link to the discussion if possible.
(4)
(0)
LTC Yinon Weiss
SSG Kevin McCulley - We didn't know that discussion was taken down. It's back up now: https://www.rallypoint.com/answers/your-incoming-commander-is-devout-liberal-does-this-affect-the-discharge-of-your-duties
Your incoming commander is devout liberal. Does this affect the discharge of your duties? |...
It is a pretty straight forward question.
(4)
(0)
COL Mikel J. Burroughs
SSG Kevin McCulley I would pose that question directly to one of the Star Admins for further clarification. By the way I wasn't trying to be smart when I sent you all the rules from RallyPoint. I truly didn't know whether you had a chance to see them. Hope that helped and you get an answers to that particular question.
(1)
(0)
COL Mikel J. Burroughs
SSG Kevin McCulley There you go. LTC Yinon Weiss manages this site very closely as the CEO and is actively engaged. You are back up and running. Take care and let's have some great future discussions!
(0)
(0)
2
2
0
What in hell is "Cultural Marxism"?
"Marxism" a.k.a. "Communism" is an economic philosophy and/or a method of historical analysis.
"Marxism" a.k.a. "Communism" is an economic philosophy and/or a method of historical analysis.
(2)
(0)
SSG Kevin McCulley
With more eloquence than I can summon at 5am.
I Acknowledge That Cultural Marxism Exists
It seems rather odd in this day and age to deny the existence of Cultural Marxism as an intellectual movement. But it seems that this meme has been gaining traction lately on the left. It was recently the subject of...
(0)
(0)
COL Ted Mc
SSG Kevin McCulley - Staff; Thank you.
Unfortunately this looks like it means that we also have to deal with "Cultural Capitalism" as some sort of "Grand Conspiracy" as well.
What you are actually seeing is analogous to "The Protestant Reformation" in which the less than top level of the rich and powerful, utilizing large numbers of the "disenchanted", attempted to implement their "vision of society" in the face of the entrenched opposition of the rich and powerful (who had managed to convince a high percentage of the population that the existing society was "God's Natural Order Of Things") who were reaping the vast majority of the benefits of the "existing order". Where they succeeded, they managed to supplant the previous "natural governing class" and ensure that they were the ones who were reaping the vast majority of the benefits of the "New Existing Order".
(It's also analogous to the American Revolution where "Cultural Americanism" was used by the less than top level of the rich and powerful to toss out the top level of the rich and powerful and thus bring most of the prosperity and democratic freedoms to themselves - but you don't want to hear that.)
In short, you probably can't have a society that DOESN'T have "Schelling Points" and those "Schelling Points" are likely to be clustered around "essential rights and freedoms" (with the "essential" being related to "essential to the type of society desired" and having nothing whatsoever to do with "natural rights" or being "Given By God").
Unfortunately this looks like it means that we also have to deal with "Cultural Capitalism" as some sort of "Grand Conspiracy" as well.
What you are actually seeing is analogous to "The Protestant Reformation" in which the less than top level of the rich and powerful, utilizing large numbers of the "disenchanted", attempted to implement their "vision of society" in the face of the entrenched opposition of the rich and powerful (who had managed to convince a high percentage of the population that the existing society was "God's Natural Order Of Things") who were reaping the vast majority of the benefits of the "existing order". Where they succeeded, they managed to supplant the previous "natural governing class" and ensure that they were the ones who were reaping the vast majority of the benefits of the "New Existing Order".
(It's also analogous to the American Revolution where "Cultural Americanism" was used by the less than top level of the rich and powerful to toss out the top level of the rich and powerful and thus bring most of the prosperity and democratic freedoms to themselves - but you don't want to hear that.)
In short, you probably can't have a society that DOESN'T have "Schelling Points" and those "Schelling Points" are likely to be clustered around "essential rights and freedoms" (with the "essential" being related to "essential to the type of society desired" and having nothing whatsoever to do with "natural rights" or being "Given By God").
(0)
(0)
SSG Kevin McCulley
Sir, cultural capitalism is the native culture of this land. I wouldn't have such a problem with the marxists if they were at least honest about it. I see them is evil and Machiavellian in there acts. They do not play by the rules and thus do not deserve their protections. I happen rather to like living in a free society where I the master of my fate. They happen to like to use those freedoms to destroy it. I am NOT a religious person by any measure of the word but I do look at the Constitution as an eloquent solution to mankind's failings. Of course being honorable men our founders never foresaw the collusion between the holders of the checks and balances that could be used to create a tyranny we have today. We have mechanisms for change implanted in our founding documents and if you do not use these methods as prescribed your acts are nefarious and suspect.
(0)
(0)
COL Ted Mc
SSG Kevin McCulley - Staff; Prior to the American Revolution, "Cultural Monarchy" was the "native" culture of America.
In any society you will always have the "next to top" layer attempting to convince the layers below them that the "top" layer (which always regards itself as the "natural governing class") ought to be tossed out - for the benefit of the layers 3 through n, of course - and that the "nest to top" layer should really be in charge. If they fail, they are looked on as criminals and traitors. If they succeed, it doesn't take them long to realize that THEY are REALLY the "natural governing class". At which point the cycle starts all over again.
The "Marxists" (read as "theoreticians and idealists") don't worry me anywhere near as much as the "Stalinists" (read as "implementers of dictatorship under the guise of the theory of freedom") do.
In any society you will always have the "next to top" layer attempting to convince the layers below them that the "top" layer (which always regards itself as the "natural governing class") ought to be tossed out - for the benefit of the layers 3 through n, of course - and that the "nest to top" layer should really be in charge. If they fail, they are looked on as criminals and traitors. If they succeed, it doesn't take them long to realize that THEY are REALLY the "natural governing class". At which point the cycle starts all over again.
The "Marxists" (read as "theoreticians and idealists") don't worry me anywhere near as much as the "Stalinists" (read as "implementers of dictatorship under the guise of the theory of freedom") do.
(0)
(0)
1
1
0
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google