Posted on May 6, 2022
SSG Green To Gold
3K
12
4
2
2
0
During a 15-6 commanders inquiry / investigation. What are the next steps or procedures to take if the investigation is compromised prior to notification of the subject? Example being the commander / investigating officer discussing events in a public setting for all ears to hear. Then others nearby notify the subject of the discussion?
Posted in these groups: Armycpt Company CommanderC464e4ff Investigation
Avatar feed
Responses: 4
CSM William Everroad
5
5
0
Where they talking about the event under investigation or the findings or investigation procedures? In any case, my feeling is that it would be unprofessional, but short of compromising. My guess is that the legal advisor would instruct the IO to not discuss the investigation with outside parties.

The Investigating Officer's Guide only indicates, when considering discussing the investigation:
"In appropriate cases, an investigating officer may direct witnesses not to discuss their statement or testimony with other witnesses or with persons who have no official interest in the proceedings until the investigation is complete. This precaution is recommended to eliminate possible influence on testimony of witnesses still to be heard. Witnesses, however, are not precluded from discussing matters with counsel."

However, it and AR 15-6 are silent on whether the IO should/should not discuss the investigation in an open setting. AR 15-6 does indicate that in the event of "procedural errors or irregularities in an investigation [that] have a material adverse effect on an individual’s substantial rights" should be brought to the appointing officer. In which case, they could direct the IO to correct the issue or appoint a new IO.
(5)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
MSG Intermediate Care Technician
3
3
0
One would have to ask if the IO and Commander were discussing how to proceed with a path for the investigation or were they discussing what is being investigated. If they were discussing either in a public setting, I would see that as unprofessional. That being said...if they were ONLY discussing how they will proceed with the investigation but NOT discussing details of the investigation then nothing was compromised. At least, IMHO. If they were discussing specific details as to why the investigation is happening...then yea I could possibly see that as a compromise. If you want a full legal answer, go see JAG.
(3)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Michael Hasbun
1
1
0
Edited >1 y ago
I think you're confusing a 15-6 investigation for a classified data spill.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close