14
14
0
Much has been said about us bugging out, and many picture Families hunkered down, but is that the case? Deep cover folks not essential to the mission either left long ago, or were ordered to remain for future intel. That leaves contractors and businessmen. It's not a tourist destination, so rule that out. The contractors are often given priority lift organically via corporate jets, so what type of business are the rest engaged in? Many are making major coin from the opium trade, and likely see neither need or wisdom in presenting themselves at HKIA. Time will tell, but this is just food for thought. The forces may have to fight their way out, and American blood has been spilled. No more bloodshed for anyone that chooses not to leave, regardless of nationality or reasoning. IMO.
Military service
Afghanistan
Terrorism
Drugs
Posted 3 y ago
Responses: 14
20
20
0
I'm not convinced that everyone there knew how critical this would become and how fast it would happen. And since we're well acquainted with out our government operates, I could totally buy a story in which they were told that there would be time and resources only to find that wasn't the case at all.
(20)
(0)
MAJ (Join to see)
SFC Michael Hasbun That's a logical and reasonable question. But we're talking about the government. There's no room for that here.
(0)
(0)
SFC Michael Hasbun
MAJ (Join to see) - I meant more in terms of travelers in general. Example: There is a college class that took a trip abroad in Afghanistan, and is now stranded. How on earth that made it past the planning stage to implementation is beyond me...At this point it feels like anyone who traveled to Afghanistan on their own is complicit in their own misfortune.
(0)
(0)
MAJ (Join to see)
SFC Michael Hasbun That makes sense. The only explanation I could think of for that is the fact that they are college kids. By their very nature they tend have a very Pollyanna view of the world. Who knows? Thats just my best guess.
(0)
(0)
CPT (Join to see)
MAJ (Join to see) - Apparently, many of those students were originally Afghans who were simply going back to visit families for what may be the last time (media likes to leave those bits out). Not saying it was a good idea to go back, but explains a little bit more why the risks were ignored.
Now, the major problem is however a former Afghan sporting a US passport, and a Taliban member getting a hold of them and getting doubly pissed off.
Now, the major problem is however a former Afghan sporting a US passport, and a Taliban member getting a hold of them and getting doubly pissed off.
(1)
(0)
15
15
0
as a MARINE that served in Beirut in 1983, and watched my Brothers Murdered in a terrorist attack ( by the way the same MEU and Battalion that was hit then), how can we continue to support and follow politicians that seem to be so careless and callous with the lives of our Brother and Sister service members and American Citizens ?
(15)
(0)
MSG George Hernlen
We can’t trust them or what we’re told when it comes from this WH. What most don’t know is that we’ve had the ability to stop this madness at anytime the WH wanted. The truth is this is what they wanted. Afghanistan never had a chance once Biden took office. By his deeds he destroyed everything that had been sacrificed.
(4)
(0)
SPC Kevin Ford
Cpl John Mckenrick We pulled out of Beirut because of that too. Getting the perpetrators is one thing but we also want to stop the bleeding.
(3)
(0)
10
10
0
from what I understand from what my buddies involved have said, it was basically "drop what you are doing and leave" for the pullout.
Anyone not involved in direct military operations was left in the dark, including our allies.
There is a reason this is a cluster F
Anyone not involved in direct military operations was left in the dark, including our allies.
There is a reason this is a cluster F
(10)
(0)
SGT (Join to see)
‘ In order to be President of the United States (and Commander-in-Chief), shouldn't the candidate have an ACTIVE DUTY military background????’
The only problem with the plan is that it’s definitely unconstitutional.
The only problem with the plan is that it’s definitely unconstitutional.
(0)
(0)
SSG (Join to see)
MSgt Steve Sweeney part of that plan was for the Taliban to not rush into every city and take over...which they did. There was supposed to be some sort of retaliation if they did this.
(0)
(0)
SSG (Join to see)
MSgt Steve Sweeney Ues it is a very Trump thing to say. But regardless of what deal was made, the Taliban didnt keep to their end and Biden is now the one failing to act.
(1)
(0)
SSG (Join to see)
MSgt Steve Sweeney I am aware. Are you not aware that this Admin was completely caught off guard by this situation happening? Are you unaware they actually stated this exact thing WOULDNT happen? Are you unaware that billions of dollars worth of high tech weaponry is now in Taliban hands? All due to gross incompetence.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google