Posted on May 24, 2015
SFC Fire Support Specialist
12.9K
157
86
3
-3
6
I see people constantly quoting the Second Amendment anytime an issue comes up having to do with personally owned weapons... but did you know, that the individual did not have this right until 2008? As a nation, we have had the right to form well regulated militias. The individual person, however, has only had the right to own weapons for seven years now.

It was District of Columbia v Heller (2008) that allowed all of us to own weapons.

http://www.lawnix.com/cases/dc-heller.html
Posted in these groups: 2nd amendment logo 2nd Amendment
Avatar feed
Responses: 30
SCPO Joshua I
15
15
0
Heller simply enforced a right that existed since the beginning of time and was enshrined in the Constitution at the founding of this nation.
(15)
Comment
(0)
SSgt Nicholas Johnson
SSgt Nicholas Johnson
>1 y
Completely agreed! It would appear SGT Pegg has no idea what he is talking about as his assertions are entirely incorrect. Furthermore, I would wager to bet that he didn't even read the article he's citing.
(3)
Reply
(0)
SCPO Joshua I
SCPO Joshua I
>1 y
Most people don't bother to read or understand the second amendment, it's easier to let other people think for them and tell them what to believe.
(5)
Reply
(0)
SFC Mark Merino
SFC Mark Merino
9 y
SCPO Joshua I - Sad but true. Drink this new and improved koolaid. Sheep.
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SSgt Forensic Meteorological Consultant
10
10
0
Does anyone really fall for any of this B.S.? This topic is a statement and not a question. The question is really a leading one and meant to perpetrate the loss of gun ownership through any means necessary.
(10)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SGT David T.
9
9
0
The right has always been there. The Heller decision was the first decisive case that affirmed it. If we look at the founders' writings on the subject at the time there was a clear indication of a right to private ownership. The notion that the right to keep and bear arms tied to service in the militia came about in the 19th century and was inconsistent with the founders' intent.
(9)
Comment
(0)
SFC Fire Support Specialist
SFC (Join to see)
>1 y
If you read the entire decision, it applied for a well regulated militia. Not individual people.
(0)
Reply
(3)
SGT David T.
SGT David T.
>1 y
No. The Heller decision stated thatbthe right to keep and bear arms was unconnected to militia service. And the word regulated as it is used in the second amendment means well supplied not restricted.
(5)
Reply
(0)
1LT William Clardy
1LT William Clardy
>1 y
SGT David T., the usage of "well-regulated" in the Second Amendment means neither restricted nor well-supplied. It is moreof a descriptor for being both organized and disciplined - referencing back to Congress' power to "provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining" the militia.
(5)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close