Posted on May 15, 2015
SSG Gerhard S.
2.01K
36
19
1
1
0
Under civil forfeiture, police can seize property from people who are never convicted—much less charged with—a crime. Unlike criminal forfeiture, where the government must prove property was used in the commission of crime, civil forfeiture law presumes an owner’s guilt.
http://reason.com/archives/2013/01/19/dcs-civil-forfeiture-nightmare
Avatar feed
See Results
Responses: 11
Capt Richard I P.
3
3
0
Civil Asset forfeiture is a procedure rife for systemic abuse.
(3)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Jeremiah B.
3
3
0
It should never be allowed, period. It's corruption written into law and a complete circumvention of your right to a fair trial before being penalized.
(3)
Comment
(0)
SSG Gerhard S.
SSG Gerhard S.
>1 y
Indeed, under the federal program there is no requirement for a conviction or even that charges be filed.
(1)
Reply
(0)
LT Mechanical Engineer Sr
LT (Join to see)
>1 y
Unfortunately most of the time they're not charging you, they're charging your assets.

Last Week Tonight with John Oliver did a funny but very informative (and infuriating) piece on it...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3kEpZWGgJks
(1)
Reply
(0)
SSG Gerhard S.
SSG Gerhard S.
>1 y
Yes, nicely done. As if property can be guilty of anything.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
MSgt Steven Holt, NRP, CCEMT-P
2
2
0
Asset Forfeiture is a system rife with corruption and abuse.

Any time you have a "Guilty Until Proven Innocent" mentality, those in positions of power will always seek to exploit the opportunity for their own gain and benefit.
(2)
Comment
(0)
SSG Gerhard S.
SSG Gerhard S.
>1 y
Well stated!
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close