Posted on May 11, 2015
Deep frustration in the USAF, is it the same across all services?
8.65K
37
32
1
1
0
Leadership
US Air Force
Fitness
Retention
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 11
6
6
0
The Air Force needs to adopt Lead by Example and Follow Me. The Air Force has a culture problem, and that is not a new. Be Safe LTC (Join to see)!!!
(6)
(0)
SSgt (Join to see)
Amen, COL Charles Williams. There are DISTINCT differences between the career fields in the AF where the culture is "more green than blue" - SOF, security forces, etc. I think this is due to the fact that they implement more w/ the army than the rest of the fields, and have therefore adopted the best aspects of both cultures. This has created a very viable hybrid that one would hope the rest of the service would adopt.
(3)
(0)
MSgt (Join to see)
I cant argue with the article at all. I have heard too many lectures by leadership about how my "warrior ethos" should be at the forefront and to remain fit to fight. With that being said, do not DARE fail a PT test because nobody should ever fail at anything they do! The one mistake AF is getting tiresome and I don't know if upper level leadership knows or even cares about it.
COL Charles Williams you are partially correct when you say the AF has a culture problem...it also has an identity problem.
COL Charles Williams you are partially correct when you say the AF has a culture problem...it also has an identity problem.
(2)
(0)
(1)
(0)
SSgt (Join to see)
MSgt (Join to see), I like how the article also pointed out the double-standard of the "no-mistake" enlisted corps, but the "forgive & forget" officer corps.
(1)
(0)
4
4
0
From my very little knowledge and experience with the Air Force I will say that organizationally it is incapable of operating as a military entity. It operates more like Southwest Airlines for lack of a better term. Don't get me wrong, I am not knocking them, well maybe a little but, I have had my ass bailed out of not so good scenarios because of the great Air Force we have so I am very respectful of what they do.
It's just really night and day when you see how Air Force personnel operate on a daily basis. The NCO Corps of the Air Force is so vastly different than the Army or Marines you can really relate to what Col Grannan is talking about. There is a very different interpretation of what leadership is, the Air Force is much more technically/functionally driven to where the Army is much more personally/hierarchal driven.
The one thing about the Army that keeps it rolling along is discipline. The standards that are required to be a member of the Army are (mostly) highly enforced. Wear and Appearance of the Uniform, customs and courtesies, chain of command. I am not saying that the Air Force is undisciplined but, for example, if you look at their Wear and Appearance regulation it almost mirrors the Army's AR 670-1. However, the attention paid adhering to it and the NCOs attention to enforcing it are vastly different between the two services.
I don't think the culture can be changed, it would be detrimental to operations. Probably one of the reasons it branched away from the Army into it's own service...it just didn't fit the Army culture. That's just how I see it from my small perspective would like to hear from the Zoomies on what they think.
CMSgt (Join to see) TSgt Joshua Copeland MSgt (Join to see)
It's just really night and day when you see how Air Force personnel operate on a daily basis. The NCO Corps of the Air Force is so vastly different than the Army or Marines you can really relate to what Col Grannan is talking about. There is a very different interpretation of what leadership is, the Air Force is much more technically/functionally driven to where the Army is much more personally/hierarchal driven.
The one thing about the Army that keeps it rolling along is discipline. The standards that are required to be a member of the Army are (mostly) highly enforced. Wear and Appearance of the Uniform, customs and courtesies, chain of command. I am not saying that the Air Force is undisciplined but, for example, if you look at their Wear and Appearance regulation it almost mirrors the Army's AR 670-1. However, the attention paid adhering to it and the NCOs attention to enforcing it are vastly different between the two services.
I don't think the culture can be changed, it would be detrimental to operations. Probably one of the reasons it branched away from the Army into it's own service...it just didn't fit the Army culture. That's just how I see it from my small perspective would like to hear from the Zoomies on what they think.
CMSgt (Join to see) TSgt Joshua Copeland MSgt (Join to see)
(4)
(0)
TSgt (Join to see)
MSgt (Join to see) I know what you mean about feeling out of place in PME type environments. Security forces is one of those AFSCs that's more green than blue. That being said, however, the extreme push on PT is very frustrating. I may not be the most fit person in my unit, but I know I can perform circles around my peers when it comes to job knowledge and job application. I've met people during my career who were in the gym for hours everyday, but I don't know if I could trust them for a second to know how to react in situations that go south. I've seen too many fantastic NCOs have to seperate, just because they weren't PT all-stars. The whole system just reeks of someone trying to get that star on their collar...
(1)
(0)
SrA (Join to see)
CSM (Join to see)
There's no way you can openly insult a branch, attempt to imply no offense whatsoever, when you said yourself you were knocking them, then lightly pull rank on me and remind me of tact. Let me ask you this, how would you have felt if someone was directly stating that your Army can't hack it, or that "for lack of better terms" they are the equivalent of toy soldiers? Thick skin or not, a proud person will get offended.
I in no way disrespected your rank and utilized as much tact as I received. I went straight to your opinion and made you see the unfruitfulness in the comparison. If you have a problem with my opinion, that's tough. It's my right to openly express myself and defend my branch and beliefs respectfully. This is how social sites operate. We speak freely on this social site about various issues in an informal fashion, somewhat free of those shackles. I know where the line ends regarding the upkeep of professionalism here and I haven't crossed it yet. How come you are entitled to disrespect a whole branch and I'm not entitled to respond to you defensively? Can a double standard be considered in this particular situation?
I do find it humorous that you feel that you have the privilege to make unprofessional commentary about other branches, then attempt to indirectly take jabs at my service with your "measly 28 years" comment, as if that should solidify or resolve things. I think you're trying to get me out of character...... Are you implying that because one service member has more years in the service, that makes him/her a better service member? Ultimately deeming him/her more knowledgable? The whole military can oppose to that. Again, someone come look at this. Seniority is as simplistic as it stands. A privileged position earned by reason of longer service or higher rank. In a lot of cases we have senior enlisted that just drag by and finish their time, disregarding customs and the sole reason they enlisted in the first place. I apologize for not being born in 1940. If so, I'd be able to IRONICALLY disregard tact and just spit out whatever I desire due to my highly impressive tenure, expecting no recoil at all.
If and so you feel that I'm personally attacking you, rest easy. My defenses are directed at unnecessary comments regarding our Armed Services. I'm beyond exasperated with all the branch-burning going on on this site. Anytime I see it, I'll charge right at it, no matter what rank. In most of my responses I'm even more sarcastic and, "for lack of better terms," a complete asshole to those whom merited it. This branch burning issue is a nuisance to me and one of my pet peeves, hence my argumentative stance. In my most honest opinion, I strongly felt that your initial comparison was insipid at the least.
I can admit that I somewhat went for the jugular and I will note that for future discussions while on Rallypoint. In the meantime, I will find a controversial issue on FB tonight and let loose there.
There's no way you can openly insult a branch, attempt to imply no offense whatsoever, when you said yourself you were knocking them, then lightly pull rank on me and remind me of tact. Let me ask you this, how would you have felt if someone was directly stating that your Army can't hack it, or that "for lack of better terms" they are the equivalent of toy soldiers? Thick skin or not, a proud person will get offended.
I in no way disrespected your rank and utilized as much tact as I received. I went straight to your opinion and made you see the unfruitfulness in the comparison. If you have a problem with my opinion, that's tough. It's my right to openly express myself and defend my branch and beliefs respectfully. This is how social sites operate. We speak freely on this social site about various issues in an informal fashion, somewhat free of those shackles. I know where the line ends regarding the upkeep of professionalism here and I haven't crossed it yet. How come you are entitled to disrespect a whole branch and I'm not entitled to respond to you defensively? Can a double standard be considered in this particular situation?
I do find it humorous that you feel that you have the privilege to make unprofessional commentary about other branches, then attempt to indirectly take jabs at my service with your "measly 28 years" comment, as if that should solidify or resolve things. I think you're trying to get me out of character...... Are you implying that because one service member has more years in the service, that makes him/her a better service member? Ultimately deeming him/her more knowledgable? The whole military can oppose to that. Again, someone come look at this. Seniority is as simplistic as it stands. A privileged position earned by reason of longer service or higher rank. In a lot of cases we have senior enlisted that just drag by and finish their time, disregarding customs and the sole reason they enlisted in the first place. I apologize for not being born in 1940. If so, I'd be able to IRONICALLY disregard tact and just spit out whatever I desire due to my highly impressive tenure, expecting no recoil at all.
If and so you feel that I'm personally attacking you, rest easy. My defenses are directed at unnecessary comments regarding our Armed Services. I'm beyond exasperated with all the branch-burning going on on this site. Anytime I see it, I'll charge right at it, no matter what rank. In most of my responses I'm even more sarcastic and, "for lack of better terms," a complete asshole to those whom merited it. This branch burning issue is a nuisance to me and one of my pet peeves, hence my argumentative stance. In my most honest opinion, I strongly felt that your initial comparison was insipid at the least.
I can admit that I somewhat went for the jugular and I will note that for future discussions while on Rallypoint. In the meantime, I will find a controversial issue on FB tonight and let loose there.
(0)
(0)
SrA (Join to see)
CSM (Join to see)
I have no problem admitting my wrongs. Don't misconstrue my intent and think I'm submitting, I still dislike your commentary and arrogant stance.
I'm reasoning with the situation even after you attempted to undermine a branch, my intelligence and my service with your outstanding and stupendous 28 years of service. I can't say the same for you regarding reasoning. Not admitting a mistake is a bigger mistake, which often leaves one without much to say.
We're often looking at our shadow because we want to avoid the shame or embarrassment that comes along with admitting mistakes.
I have no problem admitting my wrongs. Don't misconstrue my intent and think I'm submitting, I still dislike your commentary and arrogant stance.
I'm reasoning with the situation even after you attempted to undermine a branch, my intelligence and my service with your outstanding and stupendous 28 years of service. I can't say the same for you regarding reasoning. Not admitting a mistake is a bigger mistake, which often leaves one without much to say.
We're often looking at our shadow because we want to avoid the shame or embarrassment that comes along with admitting mistakes.
(0)
(0)
2
2
0
We are now a one mistake AF. Look at last years force shaping madness. No room for politics in war fighting.
(2)
(0)
SSgt (Join to see)
I would go one further than that, MSgt (Join to see). It seems that the enlisted corps is a "one mistake AF", but the officer corps get a little more leeway.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google