Posted on Feb 24, 2014
SrA Zachary Bolling
3.45K
14
10
2
2
0

Should an E-5 admin troop have the same base pay as an E-5 in a combat oriented field such as infantry or maybe even special forces?


This was a discussion while I was in. Would it make sense to pay different career fields differently or have a monthly bonus?

Avatar feed
Responses: 8
SFC Michael Hasbun
4
4
0

I'd be cautious with this train of thought for the following reason; who decides what the most important fields are?

--

I can make the argument that, unless we are actively at war, grunts are useless. A mechanic will be doing his job regardless of whether we are at war. Same with Admin guys, Recruiters, Drills, Supply, etc... A grunt however does nothing but train and absorb resources while not deployed. And even then, the bulk of outside the wire activity is being done by Logisticians, not grunts.

--

If we are going to tailor pay with usefulness or MOS field, combat arms may end up unhappy..

(4)
Comment
(0)
SFC Communications Chief (S6)
SFC (Join to see)
>1 y
Definitely stirring the pot this morning aren't we?

(0)
Reply
(0)
SFC Michael Hasbun
SFC Michael Hasbun
>1 y
Just pointing out subjectivism.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Communications Chief (S6)
3
3
0
special forces are already getting specialty pay, so why change base pay, thats why its BASE PAY
every job has its perks, they don't always equate to monetary value but hey, can't have everything.

(3)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
MAJ Samuel Weber
3
3
0
In all honestly it balances out. I know in the Army an Infantry Soldier can make E-8 in 12-14 years whereas an Admin Soldier may not see E-7 until 16-20 years. So I think the promotions balance out the pay differential. Combat Arms MOSs seem to have faster promotion rates and lower cut-off scores for E5/6. 
(3)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close