Posted on Mar 19, 2015
GySgt Joe Strong
7.22K
11
7
2
2
0
I have a couple of issues, sometimes it's ignorance, or relying on an authority who was incorrect to gain my initial understanding.
For instance, I have improperly been using (sic) near a quote to indicate that I may not be faithfully reproducing the original speaker. When in fact it's supposed to be [sic] and indicating that I'm reproducing an original statement correctly, it's just the original statement that's wrong.
For any I've harmed by doing so, I apologize.
Does anyone know the term I should be using if I can't be certain of the quote and/or if I'm intentionality paraphrasing it?
Posted in these groups: Grammar scaled696 Grammar
Avatar feed
Responses: 5
CSM Michael J. Uhlig
4
4
0
(4)
Comment
(0)
GySgt Joe Strong
GySgt Joe Strong
>1 y
Thank you!
I think my biggest need is a way to note that I'm giving my imperfect recollection of another's statement. If I were doing a scholarly work, it's just more writing to accommodate that. But that process is a little more rigorous than I want to engage in for online conversations.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CW5 Desk Officer
2
2
0
I think the reason for the brackets, GySgt Joe Strong, is that [sic] is often used inside quotes -- for grammatical errors, misspelled words, and the like. So, if I said, "There test scores were terrible." ... You would quote me like this: Montgomery said, "There [sic] test scores were terrible." ... to communicate that you know there's a mistake there, but it's part of a quote.

I don't know if there is a similar convention for paraphrasing. If there is, I've never heard of it.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
Sgt Aaron Kennedy, MS
2
2
0
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close