Posted on Nov 25, 2014
What is your stand on AR 670-1/DA PAM 670-1 and the continuing boot argument? Do you stand for the regulation or wear the same boots?
18.6K
16
7
1
1
0
I get asked all the time as a Inspector General, what do I support. I as a NCO support the regulation, but when the regulation states "The exterior of the boot upper will not contain mesh but will be constructed of either all leather or a combination of leather and nonmesh fabric." I choose to pick my battles. Realize this if you h ave been deployed and seen a burned body then you know that issued or commercial they all melt. I have CSM's / SGM's that have told me it's a battle they don't worry about just as long as the Soldier does their job to the standard.
Optional boots.
(a) As an option, Soldiers may wear commercial boots of a design similar to that of the Army combat boot (tan), as authorized by the commander. The boots must be between 8 to 10 inches in height and made of tan flesh-side out cattlehide leather, with a plain toe and a soling system matching the color of the tan upper materials. Rubber and polyether polyurethane are the only outsole materials that are authorized. The soling materials will not exceed 2 inches in height, when measured from the bottom of the outsole, and will not extend up the back of the heel or boot or over the top of the toe. The exterior of the boot upper will not contain mesh but will be constructed of either all leather or a combination of leather and nonmesh fabric. Soldiers may wear optional boots in lieu of the Army combat boot (tan), as authorized by the commander; however, they do not replace issue boots as a mandatory possession item.
Optional boots.
(a) As an option, Soldiers may wear commercial boots of a design similar to that of the Army combat boot (tan), as authorized by the commander. The boots must be between 8 to 10 inches in height and made of tan flesh-side out cattlehide leather, with a plain toe and a soling system matching the color of the tan upper materials. Rubber and polyether polyurethane are the only outsole materials that are authorized. The soling materials will not exceed 2 inches in height, when measured from the bottom of the outsole, and will not extend up the back of the heel or boot or over the top of the toe. The exterior of the boot upper will not contain mesh but will be constructed of either all leather or a combination of leather and nonmesh fabric. Soldiers may wear optional boots in lieu of the Army combat boot (tan), as authorized by the commander; however, they do not replace issue boots as a mandatory possession item.
Posted in these groups: 
DA Pam 670-1
Boots
DA Pam 670-1 Boots
Posted 10 y ago
Responses: 5
3
3
0
I think the Army made the regulation with specific makes of commercial boots in mind. Frankly, I think boots are an item where appearance (within reason) means less than comfort and durability. Some of the commercial boot designs are pretty far removed from the Army standard, hence the belief by some that they are "so much better".
If the Army were to specifically allow certain commercially available boots for wear, great. Since they have specifically denied certain boots, we need to conform.
I loved my Rocky C4Ts, until I found out they were not authorized. I haven't worn them since.
If the Army were to specifically allow certain commercially available boots for wear, great. Since they have specifically denied certain boots, we need to conform.
I loved my Rocky C4Ts, until I found out they were not authorized. I haven't worn them since.
(3)
(0)
2
2
0
I have worn standard issue boots for as long as I can remember, fallen arches from miles of road marches aside. That is UNTIL, on my last deployment some younger guys, not inexperienced soldiers mind you, let me in on their previous deployment tricks. I tried on a pair of Reebok's and have been hooked. I'm not trying to advertise in the least. Any other boot would be just as good, but these particular boots were so comfortable that it made a world of difference in how my feet, knees, and hips felt. I understand that there need to be standards governing the uniform. I understand the issue of safety. I cannot understand how one of the most uncomfortable wearing boot could be declared the uniform accessory. I've been through four different uniform changes and never have I had a comfortable pair of issue boots. The hiking boots in Afghanistan were the worst. If I had purchased them myself, I definitely would have asked for my money back. As long as the boot conforms, is neat in appearance, and provides adequate safety, I see nothing wrong with it. Then again, I still have some black shoe polish laying around somewhere.
(2)
(0)
CPO Jeffrey Bohemier
Just be glad you weren’t in the Navy during the 80’s. They issued boondockers as boots in bootcamp. They were horrible. They has steel toes, but that’s about it. They offered no ankle support whatsoever. The Navy’s working uniforms during the end of the 20th century was terrible. Bell bottom dungarees with all the pockets sewn on the outside as if they had been forgotten and were added at the last minute. Navy uniforms and those issued to prisoners of Levenworth were literally the same. Only in the prison, a number replaced your name.
(0)
(0)
2
2
0
There are many options out there that comply to regulation and look and feel better than standard issue.
Just find one that works for you and stick with it. I used to wear the Nike's until I found out they were not authorized. I now wear the Reebok's you can find at Clothing Sales. They are not as light but have way more support.
Just find one that works for you and stick with it. I used to wear the Nike's until I found out they were not authorized. I now wear the Reebok's you can find at Clothing Sales. They are not as light but have way more support.
(2)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google