Posted on Mar 14, 2017
SGT Robert Kromminga
15.2K
7
10
1
1
0
Posted in these groups: Policy PolicyAr Army Regulations
Avatar feed
Responses: 9
SGM Erik Marquez
2
2
0
The onus is on the person citing "per policy or regulation " to provide it, cant provide it, it does not exist nor will it be considered.
and that works both ways>

"SGT you need to submit an original ink signed copies, per regulation photo copies are not allowed"

Sir, what regulation is that?

"Sir, here is my form, yes I know its a copy, AR-123 says clear readable copies are allowed, no ink signature required"
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
COL Ardis Ferguson
1
1
0
I was gigged on a technical inspection because I wasn’t holding a wrench like a picture showed when the para stated hold the wrench in a way that ensures positive control through it’s use. I did a DA 2028 requesting clarification. A change page came out clearly starting that pictures in the technical manual were not the definitive guidance.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Robert Kromminga
1
1
0
This happened over 5 years ago and I know the regulation has changed since, APFT - I failed an APFT (missed the run) and was informed by the AO that I would take another one for record in July after Annual training, I asked if I could take one before Annual training instead, was told yes and if I passed would not have to worry about the one in July. So I had a E-5 and an E-6 assist me with taking the test, the E-5 was to timer since he was on profile for his knee that was injured in country, the E-6 scored it and even ran with me on the run. I passed. Filled out the paperwork and submitted it, then the S1 OIC said the test was no good because the regulation says that a person on profile can no administer an APFT. I asked for a copy, never got one. Pulled a copy and read the regulation myself and did not see it, asked the S1 OIC if they could show me where it was because I didn't see it. Was told it was a Battalion policy that a person who has not passed their APFT can not administer one, asked for a copy but never got one. This went back and forth for a few months then in July when I took to APFT again with the new Battalion commander, he asked why I was taking it again since he was aware that I took it just a few weeks before. I informed him of what I was told. Then a few weeks later a battalion policy was signed and published with a back date of 6 months.
(1)
Comment
(0)
SPC Member
SPC (Join to see)
>1 y
Seems odd to backdate a policy like that. It's just proof right there that we messed up on something and let's backdate it so we're right. That's the Army.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close