Posted on Aug 31, 2016
SGT Robert K.
4.73K
2
4
2
2
0
Issues with commands ignoring regulation procedures and timelines then is hostile to soldiers who point it out.
Posted in these groups: Ar Army RegulationsF7c3338a Supply
Avatar feed
Responses: 3
1LT Safety Health Environmental Professional
0
0
0
Ugh. Tough issues we face both in civilian and military life. What becomes most critical then is the delivery and or the method of delivery. The up most respect and sincere reminder using the chain of command to "inform" of such pending needs is wise.
During planning meetings and the use of memorandums are another method.
Often, just undue respect to the person you need to inform in a friendly reminder as you pass by can often be very effective. It is all dependent upon the unit "command climate."
Then there are the other support channels one can use - respectfully who have the ability to do a "friendly reminder," thus removing the fear or potential of retaliation[s].
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SGT David T.
0
0
0
Dealt with this a few times. Don't admit to anything and point out every single failure in their procedures in your rebuttal statement. My last rebuttal was 23 pages pointing out their failures and I was found not liable. Unfortunately, I had to deal with this after I ETSed.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
1stSgt Sergeant Major/First Sergeant
0
0
0
Need a little more detail IOT provide guidance.
(0)
Comment
(0)
SGT Robert K.
SGT Robert K.
>1 y
Regulation states that once a document number is assigned they have a time frame to complete the investigation, have JAG review and make findings know to parties involved but that time has already elapsed. But they wait nearly 8 months after the document number is assigned before even starting the investigation. And just an FYI, the units and personal involved are not deployed or on any special missions or unavailable that would delay the process.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close