Posted on Jul 22, 2016
What companies do you wish were more active on RallyPoint?
5.11K
24
14
11
11
0
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 9
Suspended Profile
SGT (Join to see) - Boeing, Raetheon, Northrup, General Dyanmics, Lockheed Martin. McDonnell Douglas, Rockwell, BAE, Thales, L3, United Technologies, SAIC, CSC, HP, Harris, Antanov, Sikorsky, Honeywell, Pratt & Whitney, ITT, Cubic, SRA, Mitre, Teledyne, Siemens, Phillips, Motorola, Dow, Monsanto, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Bayer, Lilly, Johnson & Johnson, AstraZenica, Sanofi, GSK, Amgen, Bristol Meyers Squibb, Baxter, Gillead, Remington, Kalashnikov, Smith & Wesson, Colt, Sig, Beretta, Glock, Sandia, Los Alamos, Livermore, Zia, Pantax, Halliburton, KBR, Salk Institute, All PMCs, and Trump Industries.
I believe anyone making money from the US Military Industrial Complex should be more actively engaged in understanding and supporting each and every one of the men and women who have served and/or are actively serving in the US Armed Services, US Intelligence Community. and/or US Defense Community. These Officers and Enlisted are ultimately their clients . . . and while their focus has in the past been largely concentrated on politicians allocating huge sums of money for their products . . . ultimately the individual service members are their clients and consumers of their products . . . and if any of their products should fail to perform as advertised these are the individuals most likely to be dissatisfied and look back to the manufacturers for satisfaction. Beyond all this . . . these manufacturers and contractors owe their entire existence to their ability to satisfy these customers, Warmest Regards, Sandy :)
LTC Yinon Weiss CPT Aaron Kletzing
I believe anyone making money from the US Military Industrial Complex should be more actively engaged in understanding and supporting each and every one of the men and women who have served and/or are actively serving in the US Armed Services, US Intelligence Community. and/or US Defense Community. These Officers and Enlisted are ultimately their clients . . . and while their focus has in the past been largely concentrated on politicians allocating huge sums of money for their products . . . ultimately the individual service members are their clients and consumers of their products . . . and if any of their products should fail to perform as advertised these are the individuals most likely to be dissatisfied and look back to the manufacturers for satisfaction. Beyond all this . . . these manufacturers and contractors owe their entire existence to their ability to satisfy these customers, Warmest Regards, Sandy :)
LTC Yinon Weiss CPT Aaron Kletzing
Col Dona Marie Iversen
IBM, PriceWaterhouseCopper (PWC), KPMG, Deloitte, FTI, Apple , Target, Law Enforcement, Wall Street, Home Depot, Lowes, Executive Protection Agencies, Hospitality, Healthcare Industries, VA, Construction/Builders, Utility Companies...just to name a few across spectrum of industries
(0)
(0)
SGT (Join to see)
Damn. . .
(0)
(0)
Just a heads up. We are building out partnerships with quite a few large organizations and our job board is already quite lively. If you know of an organization that could be interested in hiring more veterans, do not hesitate to out them in touch with me. We have a number of packages that will work on many different sized organizations. My email address is [login to see] . the more folks we have involved in this community, the better equipped we will be to improve the outlook for all of our veterans and transitioning military.
(5)
(0)
SGT (Join to see)
More Linux !
IBM
Linux Foundation - they never replied to my e-mail
Canonical
CompTIA
Toys R' Us - I've been told they had a great program for Veterans
IBM
Linux Foundation - they never replied to my e-mail
Canonical
CompTIA
Toys R' Us - I've been told they had a great program for Veterans
(0)
(0)
SFC Josh Billingsley
Unfortunately, some of the larger companies take quite a bit of time to get paperwork in place, but we do have quite a few in the works. Legal teams have to vet contracts, etc.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next