Posted on Jun 13, 2016
Should the USA start full scale operations vs ISIS?
4.7K
90
31
8
8
0
Posted in these groups: 
ISIS
War on Terror
ISIS War on Terror
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 19
War is hell. We should only start if we have the will and determination to see it through to the end.
(9)
(0)
(1)
(0)
MSG John Wirts
Any declaration of war shoule require a roll call vote with each members votepermanently recorded with no allowance to say oops I goofed I ment to vote against this. Any position officially expressed about the war resolution should also be a permanent part of the records. When President Clinton Declared war on Iraq, then Senator Hillary Clinton supported the war resolution based on weapons of mass destruction, her husband's declasration. Once Bush was in suddenly there were no weapons of mass destruction, and "Bush lied and people died!" Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and it took nearly 6 years after Bush left office to track those weapons down. The DEAMONCRATS LIED AND PEOPLE ARE STILL DIEING! SO much for ending the war Obama.
(1)
(0)
8
8
0
I think we should 'ramp up' operations against World Terrorism by using a variety of strategies and tactics, many of which are mentioned in this thread. Don't feel it is practical or even possible to go at them full force on the ground in Syria and Iraq because I get the feeling a majority of Americans don't support such or the potential casualties and other costs. After 10+ years of Iraq and Afgan IMO people are seriously tired and against further wide scale unconventional ground wars. As of now, people do not consider World Terrorism to be a direct threat or imminent danger to the US. A few more terrorist attacks on US soil may get people mad enough to support additional military actions. It's further necessary to get more involvement from our 'allies' before we take it all on ourselves. Trying to eradicate Daesh with troops on the ground by ourselves would be harder than trying to stomp out a massive cockroach nest with one foot.
(8)
(0)
4
4
0
(Continuation from previous post, hit send by accident)
So by going in and killing everyone associated with isis, assuming you can identify all of them, would that kill the idea?
I do not believe so; is the next step to destroy the whole Muslim religion, again that is not the answer.
I personally believe that if we could 100% isolate them from the world, by that I mean electronically, physically, militarily , transportation, financially.
This IMHO is the only way to stop them.
So by going in and killing everyone associated with isis, assuming you can identify all of them, would that kill the idea?
I do not believe so; is the next step to destroy the whole Muslim religion, again that is not the answer.
I personally believe that if we could 100% isolate them from the world, by that I mean electronically, physically, militarily , transportation, financially.
This IMHO is the only way to stop them.
(4)
(0)
MSgt John McGowan
MSGT What about those in the US already? As I understand it mostly military age men made the trip. Our President is bring them in every day. The AG makes it a crime to bother them, bullieing is to be reported. And Hillary wants to erase our borders. If we aren't the butt joke of the world we soon will be.
(0)
(0)
SFC (Join to see)
MSgt Keith Hebert Ok a little off topic, but I was "surfing" FB this AM, and someone grout up the mass killings at Wounded Knee in 1890. Someone responded that that doesn't count because the British were trying to colonize us then!?! SMH.
(0)
(0)
SGT William Howell
MSgt Keith Hebert I would think that if we destroyed them electronically that would at least slow them down. Kill any offshore social feeds and seize money that it would hamper them. Basically electronically terrorize the terrorist. Not the end answer, but it would slow them down.
(1)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google