Posted on May 19, 2014
MAJ Deputy Director, Combat Casualty Care Research Program
34K
117
83
6
6
0
14th amendment
I don't mean this to be political - I'm intending this to be a discussion of the Constitution 14th amendment, equal protection clause. Why are we still seeing anti-gay marriage proposals? The constitution is very clear on this. I don't approve of and/or not approve of gay marriage - not my business, but the constitution is what it is and we either support the constitution or we don't. The verbiage is 100% clear.

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Posted in these groups: Imgres Constitution6262122778 997339a086 z Politics4bfee3b LGBTQ+
Edited >1 y ago
Avatar feed
Responses: 23
SFC Bde Mobility Nco
8
8
0
Sir,

People use the Bible the same way. People pick and choose what they want to believe in/follow IF it suits their needs.
Im a Christian and a sin is a sin. I don't pick and choose according to my lifestyle, if I'm wrong then I'm wrong.
The same thing with the constitution instead of going by what it says, politicians pick whats backs their cause and forget about the rest of it.
(8)
Comment
(0)
Virgil Cipolla
Virgil Cipolla
1 y
Yes, the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause has been interpreted by the courts to protect against anti-gay marriage laws. I read it in https://geometrydashsubzero.io where there much useful information. The Equal Protection Clause, found in Section 1 of the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution, states that no state shall deny any person within its jurisdiction "the equal protection of the laws."
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Cpl Software Engineer
7
7
0
If religion is supposed to be separated from politics and government institutions, why is it ok for the government to inject politics into a religious organization. I don't see the LGBT crowd forcing their views of marriage into a mosque and I don't see those same people condemning the murder of those that espouse the lifestyle. What I see is a minority group bullying the religious organizations and businesses using politics. Separation should be a two-way street.
(7)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
MSG Wade Huffman
6
6
0
Sir, I'm not agreeing or disagreeing with your comment, bur rather asking a question. Isn't this a question as to the definition of marriage? Is it a legal definition, a moral definition, a religious definition, or is it somewhere in between? What about those who believe in plural marriages? Are they covered by the 14th amendment as well, or does it depend on which definition you choose to use for marriage?
Just injecting more 'what ifs' into the conversation.
(6)
Comment
(0)
SSG Charles Coats
SSG Charles Coats
10 y
CPT Prickett, court cases do not nullify or supersede the Constitution. On the contrary, there is quite a bit of controversy but perhaps you haven't heard of it. Are you familiar with the history of how the 14th Amendment came to be "passed"?
(0)
Reply
(0)
Capt Jeff S.
Capt Jeff S.
10 y
"You do not get to choose which parts of the Constitution are valid, nor do you get to determine how it is interpreted by the courts, or for that matter, what is the role of the courts."

The current Administration would do well to reflect on those words.
(0)
Reply
(0)
PO2 Mark Saffell
PO2 Mark Saffell
>1 y
I agree. If you allow Gay marriage then you have to allow plural marriages in ALL States
(1)
Reply
(0)
Brig Gen Hallie Rose
Brig Gen Hallie Rose
5 y
I agree
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close