Posted on Apr 20, 2016
Should a supervisor get negatively counseled if their Soldier does not make progress from an ABCP or APFT failure?
34.7K
74
59
6
6
0
To add onto my original question. Would the circumstances change if the Soldier was an NCO, possibly a mid-career NCO who knows by now their individual responsibilities and the Army standards. Should that NCO's supervisor get negatively counseled? How far up the ranks would it end? Would a Master Sergeant (E8) get a negative counseling for their subordinate? Would an Officer?
Battalion S1 Personnel NCOIC
SSG
Leadership
Mentorship
Edited >1 y ago
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 44
17
17
0
Could go either way. All situational based. Need more info. The leader could be counseled for not doing their part. For example: Supervisor fails to counsel; failed to enforce mandatory requirements with enrollment; failed to provide positive mentorship and guidance and support the process; failed to be the leader that helps the situation. As you can see there are several areas that could warrant a professional development counseling for the supervisor. We are the accountable and responsible! This means we can be held accountable for the actions and/or failures of our Soldiers. And this is my opinion as a leader. I hold myself to that standard.
(17)
(0)
(1)
(0)
PFC Daniel Starrett
The only thing I would add to this is that you look at the leader in question, follow the checklist that MSG Marshall Rader just gave and see if the leader did everything they were supposed to do and or more. If the leader did everything correctly, then the moment you discipline the leader, you are guilty of harassment and possibly even abuse, because the leader did nothing wrong. Now, if the leader failed to counsel the soldier when the solider failed their pt tests, then by all means you counsel the leader for failure to counsel. If the leader failed to reccommend the soldier being flagged, look at the situation and see whats going on. If it is a repeat offense for example, counsel the leader; if the soldier failing, just finished their recovery time after having surgery and the leader decided to give them a second chance the following week? Listen to your leader; you made him your leader because he knows what he is doing and he knows his soldiers better than you do.
(1)
(0)
11
11
0
This is my opinion, but I would give a qualified yes.
My reasoning: The NCO is responsible for the training and welfare of his/her subordinates. While the Soldier is responsible for how they choose to eat and what they do for PT, the NCO is responsible for developing a remedial plan and enforcing how it is carried out. If I have reason to believe that the NCO is not fulfilling those responsibilities, I will hold him/her accountable for their failure to follow up and enforce the sub-standard Soldier's PT plan.
If however the NCO does the right thing and the Soldier just up and quits, then the counseling afterwards will not be negative, but rather focus on where the NCO can improve in approach and methods in order to achieve better results next time.
You can't win them all, but you do have to try.
My reasoning: The NCO is responsible for the training and welfare of his/her subordinates. While the Soldier is responsible for how they choose to eat and what they do for PT, the NCO is responsible for developing a remedial plan and enforcing how it is carried out. If I have reason to believe that the NCO is not fulfilling those responsibilities, I will hold him/her accountable for their failure to follow up and enforce the sub-standard Soldier's PT plan.
If however the NCO does the right thing and the Soldier just up and quits, then the counseling afterwards will not be negative, but rather focus on where the NCO can improve in approach and methods in order to achieve better results next time.
You can't win them all, but you do have to try.
(11)
(0)
MSG (Join to see)
1sg the question here is should you be counselled, for the continued failure, i think not, we have the regs and programs that guide us, we are responsible for our troops, but if you do all that is neccessary and snuffy cant do it, is that a bad on you, as senior ncos we uphold the regs not the sms personnal life or motivation to succeed, we cant save them all then thats where we step in, dont micromanage, let your juniors do there job if it doesnt work find out why and then correct, one of my biggerst problems was trying to correct diffiencies that could'nt be corrected, sometimes you just gotta cut loose, and get ride of the bad apple follow regs and do what is needed
(0)
(0)
7
7
0
If this supervisor has covered all the bases with the Soldier, counseling, personally working with the Soldier during personal time, providing dietary support etc. then NO! There is a certain amount of personal drive and motivation required and if the Soldier is proven to not be motivated then it falls on the troop.
(7)
(0)
1SG (Join to see)
Spot on CSM. At some point, Soldiers must be held accountable for their individual actions/performance. As long as the NCO has made every effort to ensure the Soldier's success, they should not be negatively impacted by a Soldier that makes a conscious decision to be substandard.
(3)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google