Posted on May 27, 2014
Police now armed for war against returning Veterans.
4K
10
6
1
1
0
In an interview with Fox 59, a Morgan County, Indiana Police Sergeant admits that the increasing militarization of domestic police departments is partly to deal with returning veterans who are now seen as a homegrown terror threat.
http://www.usaprepares.com/government-corruption-2/police-now-armed-for-war-against-returning-veterans-2
Personally I might be a little out of touch on this one. But just looking for feeback on how we as Veterans might be able to educate society. Because apparently whatever is going on now it is not working. And we ask each other why can't we get a job? Or where is the help we were promised when we got back. For a majority of Americans, I do believe they support us. But for others I really am not so sure. I leave it open to discussion.
http://www.usaprepares.com/government-corruption-2/police-now-armed-for-war-against-returning-veterans-2
Personally I might be a little out of touch on this one. But just looking for feeback on how we as Veterans might be able to educate society. Because apparently whatever is going on now it is not working. And we ask each other why can't we get a job? Or where is the help we were promised when we got back. For a majority of Americans, I do believe they support us. But for others I really am not so sure. I leave it open to discussion.
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 4
Returning veterans, gangs, drug dealers, cults, or 17" shotgun barrels. Police want to militarize; they will use whatever excuse is convenient.
(4)
(0)
CW2 Joseph Evans
It's just a shame that they are so willing to choose vets as the scapegoat/excuse of the day.
(0)
(0)
Part of the problem with this line of thinking comes from a very real lesson learned in the Iraq War. What happens when you take a group of experienced and dangerous men and let them loose in a civilian population with no sense of purpose or means of employment to feed their families?
When a US Congress filibusters bills that were intended to address that specific issue, proactive police departments interested in maintaining the peace are forced to militarize. We all grew up on "Rambo"... isn't that the way all homeless Vets behave???
In truth, we do represent a danger, but more often than not, it is to ourselves rather than the community we went forth to defend and has since abandoned us.
When a US Congress filibusters bills that were intended to address that specific issue, proactive police departments interested in maintaining the peace are forced to militarize. We all grew up on "Rambo"... isn't that the way all homeless Vets behave???
In truth, we do represent a danger, but more often than not, it is to ourselves rather than the community we went forth to defend and has since abandoned us.
(3)
(0)
The militarization of law enforcement is a topic at work and in my home for the last month or so. I am the only person with LE experience at home, but my partner at work was prior LE. My wife and my co-worker seem to think it is fine and does not go against what LE should be focused. I have no problem with outfitting officers with body armor and such, but draw the line on issuing armored vehicles. I like the idea of forming special units equipped with this equipment along with strict guidelines and procedures on it's deployment, keep the number of units commensurate with population of the state and strategically located for response. But the wholesale of distributing armored vehicle to any and every Law Enforcement agency wanting them is not a good idea regarding perception and economics. I teach my children and grand children the LE is the good guys, but officers that look as if they just fell out of tone of the popular video games is scarier than hell to a 4 year old, for that matter, I'd probably be liable to shoot first if I met what looks to be some sort of soldier on my farm.
As for them being armed and equipped in order to put down the returning Vet, I have heard that on many occasions and in the current environment and administration, I find it very plausible, not likely, but very plausible.
As for them being armed and equipped in order to put down the returning Vet, I have heard that on many occasions and in the current environment and administration, I find it very plausible, not likely, but very plausible.
(1)
(0)
MSgt Mike P.
I'm concerned about veterans, or others for that matter, that wish to protest, peacefully, won't be treated as they have treated other not so peacefully protesters, i.e. left to march virtually untouched, or having the Vice President work towards bailing them out. Would they also have a blind eye if they do some "peaceful destruction", as Anti-FA and BLM have been treaated.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next