Posted on Sep 28, 2015
Be careful for assuming you may judge someone incorrectly.
5.6K
25
11
6
6
0
I want to take a minute to clarify an earlier post that has created a profound amount of backlash from fellow veterans. First the question: should veterans that served their full 8 years and received an honorable discharge receive additional benefits? How the question should've been presented: Would you support a bill that would grant all veterans that served the military on multiple enlistments and were discharged honorably to receive a once a year stipend in the form of half a percent of their last known base pay on the anniversary of their ETS date?
(This has been interpreted that I'm ungrateful to the military and the VA for the benefits I already recieve) that couldn't be farther from the truth. Every year VA is looking for new ways to support veterans this was merely a suggestion. Much of the backlash and dare I say mockery came from senior NCOs and officers with well deserved retirement benefits. Benefits to which I am well aware that I don't deserve as they were earned for your full pledge to 20 years of service. I am very proud of my full 8 years I spent on active duty. Im even more proud of my two year long deployments to Iraq in support of OIF. I did everything I could to better myself as a soldier and go above and beyond. I never declined a school. So forgive me if I'm a bit offended myself as being looked down upon solely because of a question I proposed. I have thick skin I understand the military way I don't need a basic training timeout card. But please don't judge me based upon your assumption that I was just a lowly E-5 that did his 3 or 4 years for his college money and wants to suck the VA dry. I'm not looking for apologies I just wanted to clarify my previous question. Thanks for reading and thanks to those whom did respond with tact and professionalism.
(This has been interpreted that I'm ungrateful to the military and the VA for the benefits I already recieve) that couldn't be farther from the truth. Every year VA is looking for new ways to support veterans this was merely a suggestion. Much of the backlash and dare I say mockery came from senior NCOs and officers with well deserved retirement benefits. Benefits to which I am well aware that I don't deserve as they were earned for your full pledge to 20 years of service. I am very proud of my full 8 years I spent on active duty. Im even more proud of my two year long deployments to Iraq in support of OIF. I did everything I could to better myself as a soldier and go above and beyond. I never declined a school. So forgive me if I'm a bit offended myself as being looked down upon solely because of a question I proposed. I have thick skin I understand the military way I don't need a basic training timeout card. But please don't judge me based upon your assumption that I was just a lowly E-5 that did his 3 or 4 years for his college money and wants to suck the VA dry. I'm not looking for apologies I just wanted to clarify my previous question. Thanks for reading and thanks to those whom did respond with tact and professionalism.
Posted 9 y ago
Responses: 8
"Would you support a bill that would grant all veterans that served the military on multiple enlistments and were discharged honorably to receive a once a year stipend in the form of half a percent of their last known base pay on the anniversary of their ETS date? "
No, I would not support that bill. There are already benefits for Soldiers who served and then chose to got out to pursue other ventures. I think the benefits provided at this point are sufficient.
It would be NICE to keep providing more benefits for any number of reasons, but I don't think that 8 years is necessarily any different than 4 years or 12 years. It would also be nice to provide universal health care; reliable, safe, fast, long-distance public transportation; etc etc etc. But that's not in the budget.
So, respectfully, I have to answer with a "No."
No, I would not support that bill. There are already benefits for Soldiers who served and then chose to got out to pursue other ventures. I think the benefits provided at this point are sufficient.
It would be NICE to keep providing more benefits for any number of reasons, but I don't think that 8 years is necessarily any different than 4 years or 12 years. It would also be nice to provide universal health care; reliable, safe, fast, long-distance public transportation; etc etc etc. But that's not in the budget.
So, respectfully, I have to answer with a "No."
(4)
(0)
No worries, some guys are just dicks...it shows who they are, not who you are!
(2)
(0)
SGT Del Lavature You'd probably be better off posting this in the original thread, Sarge. You can edit it.
(2)
(0)
Read This Next