Avatar feed
Responses: 7
SFC Retention Operations Nco
5
5
0
The DEA has and maintains a stranglehold on drug laws by labeling several mostly harmless drugs as Schedule 1. It's baffling to me that drugs with almost no lethal dose like Marijuana, LSD, MDMA, and Psilocybin are scheduled as more dangerous than Methamphetamine and opioids.

Until that changes the federal government will have an uphill battle legalizing Marijuana
(5)
Comment
(0)
David King
David King
>1 y
Psilocybin is actively being studied as a treatment for depression and anxiety. It may be getting FDA approval fairly soon. They say a single dose is all it takes. Hopefully the DEA will take notice, and deschedule it, or at least place it in a lower schedule, like Schedule 4.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SFC Retention Operations Nco
SFC (Join to see)
>1 y
David King Psilocybin has been being actively studied for over a decade now for depression and end of life anxiety. The reason it's taken so long to study is that the DEA schedules it so high and makes it so difficult to achieve approval for its use in studies. The DEA has had plenty of data showing its value and potential for more than a decade, it's not likely to deschedule it any time soon.

The LD50 for it is 280 mg/kg. That means if a 150 lb person was consuming the most common type of mushrooms, cubensis, they would have to eat six pounds of mushrooms to eat what would be a lethal dose for 50% of the population. As far as drugs go its almost impossible to overdose. Politics are what keep psilocybin a schedule 1 drug, not safety data.
(2)
Reply
(0)
David King
David King
>1 y
You are correct, most of these substances are pretty safe. I do have to take issue with marijuana, however. Some folks can handle it fine, but others, like myself, cannot. I developed terrible panic attacks from smoking weed, and I regret having done it. It pretty much ruined my life. And I'm not sure there is a way to tell how a particular individual will react to it beforehand. My best guess is to never give it to someone with a nervous disposition.
As far as psilocybin goes, do they actually give enough to cause a trip? Or is the dose less than that?
Yes, the federal government has been very recalcitrant about studying these types of substances. For many years, getting funding for a study was like pulling hen's teeth. I have to wonder how many folks could have been helped over the years had the studies begun in the 1960s had been allowed to continue.
Harry Anslinger and Richard Nixon have a lot to answer for, for this failed drug war. One can make all sorts of valiant efforts, but it is simply unwinnable, unless the nation is turned into a totalitarian tyranny (and I still have doubts). The money would be better spent on other things, like helping our returning veterans get the help they need to process the experiences they have gone through. The VA could certainly use a lot of improvement.
I see my mistake here, just discovered the reply button under your post.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CWO3 Us Marine
5
5
0
They've had many years to study it. I'm not sure it fits into military life, but it's not my call. Civilian legalization may create revenue for the States, but at a cost. It's getting a bit late to use the morality issue. Alcohol and tobacco are not exactly harmless.
(5)
Comment
(0)
David King
David King
>1 y
Funny thing about marijuana. Some folks can handle it with no problem at all. Others, like myself, can develop horrible panic attacks from it. It took me some years to figure out how to control them. And you really can't tell beforehand who can handle it, and who can't.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Kelly Fuerhoff
2
2
0
I think it should be allowed for military and DoD and clearance holders. Alcohol is far worse but that's not a denier to hold a clearance unless you're abusing it.

I don't think military will allow it nor clearance holders. But it's safer than alcohol use.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close