5
5
0
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 19
NO! This is a terrible article, and disrespectful to our President, civilian leadership and many military leaders! Sure - we have problems with budgets and challenges going forward, but this sort of alarmist, politically-slanted blame-mongering is not an accurate picture of our current leaders or our military capabilities!!
(16)
(0)
CSM, I couldn't take it. This article reminds me of that "SoldierofSteel" guy who bitched and moaned about the Army and when it all was stripped away, he was bitching about not making SFC, so he gets out. The military does have many of the problems the author mentions, always have, always will. What he didn't mention that in order to keep a military at a "top notch" level of readiness, it costs money. We're running low on it, and even with us like we are, we're still spending more than the next 10 countries combined? The problem is where are we spending the money. If you took out the BS pet programs, the needless TDY's, put teeth into contracts that make severe penalties for non compliance or missed POA&M's, that's money we can invest back into our services. If we did an honest reassessment of our global responsibilities and where are we needed vs. where we want to go, we'd see that we are not needed as much as we think we are, and the argument of using us as "influence" falls flat. Can't be doing too much influencing doing a long ride through Europe to show that "we're still here"....today, and next month it'll be someone else. Russia damn sure didn't feel the need to do a "ride" through anywhere. China is doing it's thing in the Pacific, and the countries over there are asking for US to intervene? Why don't you use this new high speed idea....send your OWN Navy out there and rattle a few sabers for a change. I'm DAMN sure there are many leaders in the services who would LOVE to get out and do some cool shit in the field, do an all day gunnery, even a night one. Just go to the crew serve range and just allow the troops to unleash some frustration with the .50cal. Move the tanks more than six feet to ensure they move on their own before putting them back on line. But we can't. Too many hands in a small pot, and the hands that are in there are civilian pushing the military ones out. I also disagree with the military "rotting" away. There is NOT a shortage of troops in this country. There isn't a shortage of men and women who are willing to come back and beat the brakes off anyone who messes with us. We're not rotting at all. But unless we can really dig in hard, do that check up from the neck up, we're going to remain stagnant no matter who is in office next year. I remember visiting big posts and looking at the motor pools thinking WOW.... freaking awesome. I've seen some more and now I still think WOW...they haven't moved those POS in at least two weeks with all that dust on them.
BTW is there any way someone can tell 2CR to stop destroying everything they own? It was funny the first fifty times on FB, but between them and I believe 173rd with the airborne vehicles that weren't jump qualified turning into dirt darts, maybe it's best that they do leave everything alone, in place, on line in the motor pools?
BTW is there any way someone can tell 2CR to stop destroying everything they own? It was funny the first fifty times on FB, but between them and I believe 173rd with the airborne vehicles that weren't jump qualified turning into dirt darts, maybe it's best that they do leave everything alone, in place, on line in the motor pools?
(16)
(0)
1LT Christopher Sorge
But don't illegals and social welfare programs deserve more than those who serve and have served?
(0)
(0)
SSG Warren Swan
1LT Christopher Sorge - I see nothing wrong with social welfare programs. If you're referring to SS and EBT. The public is shown a slanted view of a stereotype of what an EBT recipient "looks" like, and justifiably folks get mad. Folks get mad over SS, but no one holds congress accountable for using SS for items that were never intended to be bought with it. How can a program where all of us who work put into it, day in and day out, but it'll go broke? Illegals. When American businesses tire of using free, under the table non taxed money, revolving labor where the profits go through the roof, maybe then we'll get somewhere. But we're talking about migrant workers who get nothing as long as they stay below the radar, and businesses get day workers who work for peanuts compared to their green card brothers and sisters.
(2)
(0)
Sgt Michael Rambo
After I was retired I worked as a contractor. Still do. I can tell you that the civilian bunch in charge of projects and development have some real characters. I've seen lackadaisical attitudes from the top down. There are some good people in there but there is an equal amount of those civilian employees that need to go. Not to say there isn't issues with defense contracting racket. Programs are under-staffed and products under-developed causing cost overruns and missed deadlines. There are conflicts of interest and segmented services which requires more payout. I could go on and on but most people have already seen it. We are lacking professionals who know how to run these projects both on the Active and civilian side and lack the technical expertise to spot the bull****. But this happens in every Department and Agency (D/A), not just Defense. Considering the work I've done and people I've worked with from other Departments, the DoD is probably the best out of all of them. There are many D/A's I would never contract with like State, DHS, Energy, etc. Sometimes I wonder how in the world anything gets done the Federal realm. One thing is for certain. Allowing Free Market to take place of these bloated D/A's and going back to a system with more troops taking care of business rather than having such a large civilian force would sure make things run a lot smoother.
(1)
(0)
I read this article and this person wants to harken back to the days the military had virtually unlimited funds, you didn't had to be PC or sensitive to a service members needs, and everyone "stayed in their lane and "knew their role."
Sadly, this ain't the post WWII military.
The military has, is, and will continue to change. Stating that the US military is a fish rotting from the head" is disrespectful to the leadership, potentially toxic rhetoric to subordinates, and typical of someone that will not suffer the consequences for saying things like this.
Do we have toxic and sub-standard leaders in our military? Yes and we always will BUT that is a battle that should be waged by those leaders STILL in The Uniform, not some armchair quarterback that will suffer no blowback if some young Trooper parrots this...individual's opinion.
BLUF if you aren't a part of the solution, you are a part of the problem and sadly this person doesn't want a well though out and rational solution but a salted and scorched earth approach. Like it or not, the military will keep changing long after we're gone and whining about it not being the military you remember is just that: whining.
Sadly, this ain't the post WWII military.
The military has, is, and will continue to change. Stating that the US military is a fish rotting from the head" is disrespectful to the leadership, potentially toxic rhetoric to subordinates, and typical of someone that will not suffer the consequences for saying things like this.
Do we have toxic and sub-standard leaders in our military? Yes and we always will BUT that is a battle that should be waged by those leaders STILL in The Uniform, not some armchair quarterback that will suffer no blowback if some young Trooper parrots this...individual's opinion.
BLUF if you aren't a part of the solution, you are a part of the problem and sadly this person doesn't want a well though out and rational solution but a salted and scorched earth approach. Like it or not, the military will keep changing long after we're gone and whining about it not being the military you remember is just that: whining.
(13)
(0)
PO1 (Join to see)
Agreed. You will note that he mentions the period in which he served as the best period. "By 1990, the US Army was a magnificently trained and equipped fighting force."
Kind of a tired argument nowadays: Its the same thing about people complaining about the new generation doing things differently from the old generation.
Kind of a tired argument nowadays: Its the same thing about people complaining about the new generation doing things differently from the old generation.
(3)
(0)
SFC (Join to see)
PO1 (Join to see) SSG Michael Hartsfield I couldn't agree with you guys more. It is a only natural reaction to be mostly unfamiliar with a difference in operational stance then what you experienced in your own service period. However, dis-remembering the multitude of changes an individual servicemember can experience across a single term of enlistment, let alone through two or more decades of service, is blind and purposefully ignorant. Change is often good, but seldom comfortable.
And by the way, I feel like most people would agree that the late 80's and early to mid 90's represented one of our lowest points in defense readiness as we made the largely unrecognized and massively difficult transition from the Cold War to the Global War on Terror
And by the way, I feel like most people would agree that the late 80's and early to mid 90's represented one of our lowest points in defense readiness as we made the largely unrecognized and massively difficult transition from the Cold War to the Global War on Terror
(3)
(0)
MSG (Join to see)
very well said and i agree a strong nation must rely on its millitary we train for the worst and hope for the best none of us want to go to war but again its our job and that job costs money maybe we can divert funds from the people that controll our lives, they seem to have it rich
(0)
(0)
Read This Next