Avatar feed
Responses: 6
SPC Elijah J. Henry, MBA
4
4
0
"A law repugnant to the Constitution is void." Marbury v Madison, 1803, SCOTUS https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/5/137
(4)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
MAJ Matthew Arnold
3
3
0
Since "We the People" are the government, in a sense, then his comments are valid. The rule of law argument is valid, but when the law is established by a few or by a government no longer validated by the people then the law is invalid. To support and defend the constitution, against all enemies, foreign and (specially) domestic, civil disobedience is required at times. The Boston Tea Party, Lexington and Concord, and other acts of the colonists prior to the Declaration of Independence, were acts of civil disobedience, which I would add, are highly respected and revered acts by Americans today.
(3)
Comment
(0)
CPT Jack Durish
CPT Jack Durish
>1 y
To be accurate, We the People are not the government. We are the sovereign. We grant to the government whatever limited powers they have to serve us. However, beyond that, you are absolutely correct and I stand with you
(0)
Reply
(0)
MAJ Matthew Arnold
MAJ Matthew Arnold
>1 y
I like your clarification. (I am not always precise with words.)
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Sgt Apprentice Security Policeman
3
3
0
unconstitutional laws are not laws and will not be followed
(3)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close