Avatar feed
Responses: 8
CW4 Guy Butler
5
5
0
It’s really sad that so few have any idea of the consequences of Roe being overturned…

I’m pessimistic that the forced birthers will prevail in the short term.
(5)
Comment
(0)
SrA John Monette
SrA John Monette
>1 y
They know the consequences. They just don't care.
(5)
Reply
(0)
SFC Kelly Fuerhoff
SFC Kelly Fuerhoff
>1 y
They know - they don't care until it affects them. It's about power and control and that is it. Advocating for the "unborn" is the easiest thing to advocate for because the unborn can't hold them accountable. There's no work they have to put into it other than getting people they want into legislative positions to hold on to that control.

It's also rooted in white supremacy. Birth rates are down especially for white babies. They're scared to become the minority because they think that if they are the minority and POC, indigenous and women get power that the former minorities will do to them what they did to those minorities. That's it. They want to keep their power and control. It's never been about fetuses or children or any of it.
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Kelly Fuerhoff
3
3
0
Lt Col Scott Shuttleworth
Posted 2 h ago
More details are out that aren't in the liberal narrative...see Steven Immermans comments below.

What "liberal narrative" is there with a 10 year old RAPED?

Did she get the abortion? Answer is yes...maybe illegal in OH but the voters made that choice. She traveled and got it done...do I agree with their statutes...NO...But the decision resided in the state where it CONSTITUTIONALLY SHOULD BE!

Did the voters make that choice? Or did the legislators run on false pretenses like the three most recent conservative justices lied during their nomination hearings?

I don't understand what exactly you're trying to convey with your posts. Everyone should have the same opinion when anyone gets raped especially a TEN YEAR OLD CHILD.
(3)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Kelly Fuerhoff
3
3
0
1SG Steven Imerman
Posted 2 h ago
a) According to the victim's mother, the sex was consensual, not rape.
b) The impregnator/rapist was not a minor, as reported by the abortion provider, but rather a since arrested 27-year-old illegal immigrant. He was arrested not for rape but for sex with a minor.
There are a lot of unclear details about this whole thing even now.

a. Children can't consent to sex. It's rape in the US. No matter what anyone wants to say. Her mother can believe what she wants but she is a horrible mother if she's defending her child's rapist and that child should be removed from her care immediately. It's possible she's in an abusive relationship herself with that person but that doesn't negate her inability to protect her child.
b. Do you not think that maybe that perpetrator lied to the abortion provider when giving his age? Either way, 17 or 27 that's a rape charge for the perpetrator. I'm not sure where you saw he was charged with "sex with a minor" because: "He's since been charged with rape, a felony of the first degree in Ohio." You can even look up his inmate record in the Franklin County Ohio Inmate search where it clearly lists his charge as "Rape."
Also there's no such thing as "sex with a minor." Sex is a consensual act - minors can't consent.

There's nothing unclear about this. A child was raped and impregnated. The man admitted to raping her. The mother is a horrible mother defending him and that child needs to be either put with family who will care for her or taken by CPS and put in foster care (which doesn't guarantee her safety either).

I don't get you right wing people who try to deflect the gravity of this situation.
(3)
Comment
(0)
SFC Kelly Fuerhoff
SFC Kelly Fuerhoff
>1 y
PO1 Jeff Chandler I never said that dipshit. Read the fact I COPIED THAT from Imerman. And then I fucking corrected him. Maybe learn some reading comprehension. Did you even read the entire thing? Apparently not but I'm not surprised because you're a moron. And a bigot. Among other things.
(1)
Reply
(1)
SFC Kelly Fuerhoff
SFC Kelly Fuerhoff
>1 y
PO1 Jeff Chandler I clearly said she was raped. And said that sex is consensual as an act and anything WITHOUT consent is not sex. It's rape.

Jfc you're the most ignorant person I've ever communicated with.
(0)
Reply
(1)
SFC Kelly Fuerhoff
SFC Kelly Fuerhoff
>1 y
Oh no Jeff blocked me. Whatever shall I do? Go ahead join the miserable old people club. Lol.

I'm not the miserable and vile one. You are and your clique. Sorry you're so ignorant and can't read.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SGT Retired
SGT (Join to see)
>1 y
“It takes a sick puppy to even use that word concerning a 10 year old..”

Jeff, did you also tell Imerman he was a sick puppy?
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close