Posted on Jul 20, 2022
Medals of Honor for soldiers who perpetrated Wounded Knee massacre may be rescinded
1.12K
39
10
15
15
0
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 8
SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL
The Wounded Knee Massacre, also known as the Battle of Wounded Knee, was a massacre of nearly three hundred Lakota people by soldiers of the United States Army. It occurred on December 29, 1890, near Wounded Knee Creek (Lakota: Čhaŋkpé Ópi Wakpála) on the Lakota Pine Ridge Indian Reservation in the U.S. state of South Dakota, following a botched attempt to disarm the Lakota camp. The previous day, a detachment of the U.S. 7th Cavalry Regiment commanded by Major Samuel M. Whitside approached Spotted Elk's band of Miniconjou Lakota and 38 Hunkpapa Lakota near Porcupine Butte and escorted them 5 miles (8.0 km) westward to Wounded Knee Creek, where they made camp. The remainder of the 7th Cavalry Regiment, led by Colonel James W. Forsyth, arrived and surrounded the encampment. The regiment was supported by a battery of four Hotchkiss mountain guns.
On the morning of December 29, the U.S. Cavalry troops went into the camp to disarm the Lakota. One version of events claims that during the process of disarming the Lakota, a deaf tribesman named Black Coyote was reluctant to give up his rifle, claiming he had paid a lot for it. Simultaneously, an old man was performing a ritual called the Ghost Dance. Black Coyote's rifle went off at that point; the U.S. Army began shooting at the Indians. The Lakota warriors fought back, but many had already been stripped of their guns and disarmed.
By the time the massacre was over, more than 250 men, women and children of the Lakota had been killed and 51 were wounded (4 men and 47 women and children, some of whom died later); some estimates placed the number of dead as high as 300.[3] Twenty-five soldiers also died and thirty-nine were wounded (six of the wounded later died). Twenty soldiers were awarded the Medal of Honor. In 2001, the National Congress of American Indians passed two resolutions condemning the military awards and called on the federal government to rescind them. The Wounded Knee Battlefield, site of the massacre, has been designated a National Historic Landmark by the U.S. Department of the Interior. In 1990, both houses of the U.S. Congress passed a resolution on the historical centennial formally expressing "deep regret" for the massacre.
To those who jump right in to make excuses for the murders committed by the Army, my question is,
WHEN is it morally right and acceptable to shoot and kill unarmed women and children (along with a majority of men, who were unarmed, having been disarmed prior to that massacre?). WHEN?
ONLY a racist would make an excuse for those murders!
And NONE--not one--of those hypocritical apologists would have the right to call themselves "Christian."
To this action that may very likely be snuffed out by the wave of racists in the GOP, if it indeed FINALLY happens and those cowards are stripped of their medals for committing those murders, it does finally and officially acknowledge the evil actions of the US Army for the memory of the MOSTLY unarmed men, women, and children who were massacred by US Army soldiers, even though it's just a tiny iota of justice.
That, of course, is IF the many racists in the GOP don't get their way.
Thank you, Brother Joe, for this post.
The Wounded Knee Massacre, also known as the Battle of Wounded Knee, was a massacre of nearly three hundred Lakota people by soldiers of the United States Army. It occurred on December 29, 1890, near Wounded Knee Creek (Lakota: Čhaŋkpé Ópi Wakpála) on the Lakota Pine Ridge Indian Reservation in the U.S. state of South Dakota, following a botched attempt to disarm the Lakota camp. The previous day, a detachment of the U.S. 7th Cavalry Regiment commanded by Major Samuel M. Whitside approached Spotted Elk's band of Miniconjou Lakota and 38 Hunkpapa Lakota near Porcupine Butte and escorted them 5 miles (8.0 km) westward to Wounded Knee Creek, where they made camp. The remainder of the 7th Cavalry Regiment, led by Colonel James W. Forsyth, arrived and surrounded the encampment. The regiment was supported by a battery of four Hotchkiss mountain guns.
On the morning of December 29, the U.S. Cavalry troops went into the camp to disarm the Lakota. One version of events claims that during the process of disarming the Lakota, a deaf tribesman named Black Coyote was reluctant to give up his rifle, claiming he had paid a lot for it. Simultaneously, an old man was performing a ritual called the Ghost Dance. Black Coyote's rifle went off at that point; the U.S. Army began shooting at the Indians. The Lakota warriors fought back, but many had already been stripped of their guns and disarmed.
By the time the massacre was over, more than 250 men, women and children of the Lakota had been killed and 51 were wounded (4 men and 47 women and children, some of whom died later); some estimates placed the number of dead as high as 300.[3] Twenty-five soldiers also died and thirty-nine were wounded (six of the wounded later died). Twenty soldiers were awarded the Medal of Honor. In 2001, the National Congress of American Indians passed two resolutions condemning the military awards and called on the federal government to rescind them. The Wounded Knee Battlefield, site of the massacre, has been designated a National Historic Landmark by the U.S. Department of the Interior. In 1990, both houses of the U.S. Congress passed a resolution on the historical centennial formally expressing "deep regret" for the massacre.
To those who jump right in to make excuses for the murders committed by the Army, my question is,
WHEN is it morally right and acceptable to shoot and kill unarmed women and children (along with a majority of men, who were unarmed, having been disarmed prior to that massacre?). WHEN?
ONLY a racist would make an excuse for those murders!
And NONE--not one--of those hypocritical apologists would have the right to call themselves "Christian."
To this action that may very likely be snuffed out by the wave of racists in the GOP, if it indeed FINALLY happens and those cowards are stripped of their medals for committing those murders, it does finally and officially acknowledge the evil actions of the US Army for the memory of the MOSTLY unarmed men, women, and children who were massacred by US Army soldiers, even though it's just a tiny iota of justice.
That, of course, is IF the many racists in the GOP don't get their way.
Thank you, Brother Joe, for this post.
(6)
(0)
My $.02 -- if their actions would warrant a Medal of Honor against another non-Indian enemy, then it should stand -- If their actions were dishonorable, then they were dishonorable.
(4)
(0)
SSG Robert Perrotto
you cannot judge the actions of that time using todays cultural standards. You must judge it by the cultural standard of that time period. Like it or not, the goal was to conquer the natives, there were no rules of war against non civilized people, and the natives were considered non civilized according to the standards of that time period. The natives were a threat to expansion, to Manifest Destiny, and they had to go. All throughout history, those who conquered put those they conquered to the sword, man, woman, and child. What is wrong by todays standards does not mean it was wrong by t6he standards of the days it happened. what is happening by this nonsense is cultural marxism.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next