Avatar feed
Responses: 8
PO1 Don Gulizia
6
6
0
Media: "Informant reports that entities in Moscow paid millions to influence Clinton and U.S. State Dept."
Leftists: "Nothing to see here....move along."
Media: "Donald Trump puts ketchup on his steak."
Leftists: "That devil, he is Hitler reincarnate. He must be impeached!"
(6)
Comment
(0)
1stSgt Nelson Kerr
1stSgt Nelson Kerr
7 y
PO1 Don Gulizia - All that proves is that Fox lies a lot. And why give aitrime to a bit of political garbage that only a few loons are going to take seriously, their is no requirement taht they have to spend time on that garbage, the fools that believe it arwe the same numbskulls that were births, believe in chemtrails and believed in pizza-gate, talking to them is like trying to train a dead dog,
(1)
Reply
(0)
PO1 Don Gulizia
PO1 Don Gulizia
7 y
1stSgt Nelson Kerr - "talking to them is like trying to train a dead dog"...Yeah, I know the feeling.
(0)
Reply
(0)
1stSgt Nelson Kerr
1stSgt Nelson Kerr
7 y
since Prava d a worked for the Russians and the current admiration does also Pravda is apt
(0)
Reply
(0)
SSG Edward Tilton
SSG Edward Tilton
>1 y
Did it work? I guess not. The Russians laundered millions for Trump through the NRA and other fronts. Problem is, they won. Pouring millions into a losing cause is just tough shit
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
MSG Stan Hutchison
4
4
0
This has been investigated over and over again. Yes, some money was given to the Clinton foundation, which, by the way, has one of the highest ratings for charitable organizations. It has been proven that none of those funds went to Clinton, nor her campaign. Check out the finance records of the foundation. They are open to the public.
(4)
Comment
(0)
MSG Stan Hutchison
MSG Stan Hutchison
7 y
SSG (Join to see) - I think you were informed incorrectly. Both of the below links show 85%-88% of funds go to programs, with only 12% to 15% for overhead.

https://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.summary&orgid=16680
https://www.charitywatch.org/ratings-and-metrics/clinton-foundation/478
(1)
Reply
(0)
PO1 Don Gulizia
PO1 Don Gulizia
7 y
39d40bea
MSG Stan Hutchison - I'll go with CFC's numbers. While not as bad as the SSG states, the Clinton Foundation isn't as "charitable" as you (and charitynavigator) portray. Just on this page, the CF is 7th worst (operating cost vs giving) out of 26 charities.
(2)
Reply
(0)
MSG Stan Hutchison
MSG Stan Hutchison
7 y
Once again I see I am wasting my time. Some folks here have such hatred for the Clintons they would not believe anything good about them, regardless the source. I see no one addressed the other source I provided.
(2)
Reply
(0)
1stSgt Nelson Kerr
1stSgt Nelson Kerr
7 y
MSG Stan Hutchison - They have top ignore facts, lies are all they have,
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
1SG Dennis Hicks
3
3
0
Be very careful what you say about the Clinton's, you may schedule yourself for an assisted suicide sometime in the future with out knowing it.
(3)
Comment
(0)
Sgt Wayne Wood
Sgt Wayne Wood
7 y
Been living on someone elses time for years
(0)
Reply
(0)
1SG Dennis Hicks
1SG Dennis Hicks
7 y
I hope she starts using the new Drano mouth wash and laxative soon.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close