Posted on Oct 6, 2022
'Conspiracy theory' criticized by NY Times confirmed one day later: CEO of election-software...
989
21
12
6
6
0
Posted 2 y ago
Responses: 6
It is treason. The NY Times has abrogated its responsibility to the public to do real journalism
(3)
(0)
I've always maintained that if I sit back and wait long enough the truth will come out. And yes the truth will set us free. I have always been skeptical of electronic voting machines. Having written code for several programs used by the military at the start of the computer generation, I know how easily it is to put a back door for future manipulation. While I do not say unequivocally the election was stolen, I do think there are too many questions that have yet to be answered about the last presidential election. One of those questions is why do the left and the Democrats oppose any independent audit of the election machines? What are they afraid of? Why are they so opposed to voter ID? This flies in the face of some of their other initiatives where they demand an ID, or can they not see their own hypocrisy? And I agree with one of the other posts, the liberal media has not been doing their job of getting the truth out. The liberal media is complicit in helping create the very questions they're trying to avoid. They suppressed the hunter Biden story. And now they're trying to suppress any inquiries into possible election fraud.
(1)
(0)
Treason is defined on the federal level in Article III, Section 3 of the United States Constitution as: "only in levying War against [the United States], or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort." A state of war does not exist between the US and China.
A more appropriate charge would be espionage. In addition, there should be sanctions against China. Hopefully our allies would support those sanctions and join in.
Now here is the reality. Virtually every nation, including the US engages in espionage/
A more appropriate charge would be espionage. In addition, there should be sanctions against China. Hopefully our allies would support those sanctions and join in.
Now here is the reality. Virtually every nation, including the US engages in espionage/
(1)
(0)
Maj John Bell
CPT (Join to see) - I think you need to re-read 18 US Code 794.
Subparagraph a) deals specifically with information, material, or equipment relating to national defense and nuclear weapons.
Subparagraph b) deals specifically woith information about military forces and disposition during times of war.
Subparagraph c) deals with co-conspirators in acts or attempts to violate subparagraphs a) and b)
Subparagraph d) deals with proceeds from any acts related to violations of 18 US Code 794.
What words have I missed? What information covered by this act of espionage is covered under 18 US Code 794?
Subparagraph a) deals specifically with information, material, or equipment relating to national defense and nuclear weapons.
Subparagraph b) deals specifically woith information about military forces and disposition during times of war.
Subparagraph c) deals with co-conspirators in acts or attempts to violate subparagraphs a) and b)
Subparagraph d) deals with proceeds from any acts related to violations of 18 US Code 794.
What words have I missed? What information covered by this act of espionage is covered under 18 US Code 794?
(1)
(0)
Maj John Bell
Capt Gregory Prickett - I merely quoted the article. The article did not say that Adam Gadahn was convicted of treason. It stated that he was indicted. I am unaware of the nuances between indictment and an issue of warrant for treason, nor in this case am I sure that any nuances are significant to the discussion at hand.
I certainly believe that China and the US are in a largely adversarial relationship. I highly doubt that they would meet any legal definition of an "enemy of the US." So, as I stated up front, I believe espionage rather than treason would be the more appropriate path to pursue.
I certainly believe that China and the US are in a largely adversarial relationship. I highly doubt that they would meet any legal definition of an "enemy of the US." So, as I stated up front, I believe espionage rather than treason would be the more appropriate path to pursue.
(1)
(0)
(0)
(0)
Read This Next