Posted on Feb 28, 2024
ATF's Bump Stock Ban Heard in Supreme Court for Garland v. Cargill
1.31K
28
8
9
9
0
OK, What next? Will BATFE get a hand slap, or will bump stocks get a tax stamp?
SGT James Murphy, CPT Jack Durish,
SPC Gary Welch, SGT Mark Anderson,
CPL Douglas Chrysler, LTC Trent Klug,
CSM Charles Hayden, SMSgt David A Asbury,
SSG William Jones, MSgt Robert "Rock" Aldi
SSG Michael Noll, MAJ Dale E. Wilson, Ph.D.
SGM Erik Marquez, CW3 Harvey K.
SFC William Farrell, CPL Ronald Keyes Jr
Sgt (Join to see), SSG (Join to see)
1SG Dan Capri, LTC (Join to see)
SGT James Murphy, CPT Jack Durish,
SPC Gary Welch, SGT Mark Anderson,
CPL Douglas Chrysler, LTC Trent Klug,
CSM Charles Hayden, SMSgt David A Asbury,
SSG William Jones, MSgt Robert "Rock" Aldi
SSG Michael Noll, MAJ Dale E. Wilson, Ph.D.
SGM Erik Marquez, CW3 Harvey K.
SFC William Farrell, CPL Ronald Keyes Jr
Sgt (Join to see), SSG (Join to see)
1SG Dan Capri, LTC (Join to see)
ATF's Bump Stock Ban Heard in Supreme Court for Garland v. Cargill
Posted from ammoland.com
2nd Amendment
ATF
Supreme Court
Posted 10 mo ago
Responses: 5
6
6
0
I really don’t have a horse in this race, but a bump stock does not a machine gun make. A friend had a bump stock on an AR and I tried it dry firing and just with trigger pull. Using the bump stock I could tell I was all over the target; with trigger pull I would be on target. But, that’s just me.
(6)
(0)
4
4
0
What about that guy in Milwaukee that ran over all those people with his SUV. ??? Are we going to ban SUV's or Dinnerwear for that matter.
(4)
(0)
4
4
0
The big one with firearms and the ATF is the current United States v Chevron and a dissenting justice made this comment, "Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson posited that the Chevron doctrine serves an important purpose. Under Chevron, she suggested, Congress gives federal agencies the power to make policy choices." Chevron thrown out and the ATF will have much less power to negatively effect firearms.https://www.scotusblog.com/2024/01/supreme-court-likely-to-discard-chevron/
Supreme Court likely to discard Chevron - SCOTUSblog
It has been nearly 40 years since the Supreme Court indicated in Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council that courts should defer to an agency’s reasonable interpretation of an ambiguous statute. After more than three-and-a-half hours of oral argument on Wednesday, it seemed unlikely that the r
(4)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google