Avatar feed
Responses: 3
PO1 William "Chip" Nagel
2
2
0
LTC Eugene Chu Thank God! Glad to Hear the Supreme Couts is doing the Right Thing.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Casey O'Mally
1
1
0
Based on this write up - which leaves a lot of gaps (and that may not be NBc-s fault if the court didn't offer explanations) - the courts got this right.

A vaguely worded law is a bad law and should not be upheld.
(1)
Comment
(0)
SFC Casey O'Mally
SFC Casey O'Mally
1 y
SFC John Davis to be fair, (and this is just an example), conservatives were griping for DECADES about activist judges ruling according to ideology in Roe v. Wade.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Sgt Print Journalist
0
0
0
Edited 1 y ago
I admire and respect all the Conservative justices on the SC.
(0)
Comment
(0)
SFC Casey O'Mally
SFC Casey O'Mally
1 y
There is a legal concept called "void for vagueness." If a law is widely open for interpretation (e.g. banning "lewd" displays without defining what constitutes lewdness) such that an average citizen cannot reasonably predict whether or not a given action is legal, the law is unenforceable and should be stricken.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Sgt Print Journalist
Sgt (Join to see)
1 y
SFC Casey O'Mally Its so unfortunate that average Americans do not realize what constitutes “lewdness” these days or what is highly inappropriate to the mental health of young people. [[But then, mental health and morals are being redefined by today’s pundits and cultural engineers ].
When do the boundaries defining societal laws become unsustainable ?
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close