Avatar feed
Responses: 3
SrA John Monette
3
3
0
Consider the states where this is legal: Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi. Are we really surprised?
(3)
Comment
(0)
SFC Casey O'Mally
SFC Casey O'Mally
>1 y
It is "legal" there not through anything those states have done. The fifth circuit, which made this ruling, oversees those three states, and their ruling holds precedence over those states.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SrA John Monette
SrA John Monette
>1 y
SFC Casey O'Mally - I wouldn't be surprised to see those states pass laws allowing this.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CW4 Guy Butler
3
3
0
What the hell?? That’s not pain control, that’s torture.
(3)
Comment
(0)
SrA John Monette
SrA John Monette
>1 y
It's not even for compliance. It is, like you said, torture to extract information. Then they are going to take that information and use it to prosecute. I'm sure they won't even try very hard to verify it through another source.
(3)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Sgt Self Employed
0
0
0
Edited >1 y ago
"Plaintiffs failed to provide any controlling precedent showing that Martin’s particular conduct violated a clearly established right."
Maybe they should have had a better attorney.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close