Posted on Dec 22, 2021
Trump-appointed judge denies 1/6 rioter's charge that DOJ should prosecute BLM protesters
2.12K
21
5
11
11
0
Carl Nichols, a federal judge appointed by former President Donald Trump, has declined further examination of a charge raised by an accused Capitol rioter alleging that federal officials should also arrest racial justice protesters from Portland, Oregon for committing similar crimes against the government.
The accused rioter, Garret Miller, claimed that he was the victim of "selective prosecution." As proof, Miller pointed to the Department of Justice's decision not to issue mass prosecutions against Black Lives Matter (BLM) and anti-fascist (Antifa) rioters involved in demonstrations in Portland, Oregon during summer 2020.
Miller asked the court to compel discovery and grant an evidentiary hearing on his claim. In other words, he wanted additional time to explore his claim and then hold a court hearing to lay out his case of "selective prosecution."
The accused rioter, Garret Miller, claimed that he was the victim of "selective prosecution." As proof, Miller pointed to the Department of Justice's decision not to issue mass prosecutions against Black Lives Matter (BLM) and anti-fascist (Antifa) rioters involved in demonstrations in Portland, Oregon during summer 2020.
Miller asked the court to compel discovery and grant an evidentiary hearing on his claim. In other words, he wanted additional time to explore his claim and then hold a court hearing to lay out his case of "selective prosecution."
Trump-appointed judge denies 1/6 rioter's charge that DOJ should prosecute BLM protesters
Posted from newsweek.com
Washington
Riots
Portland
Black Lives Matter
Antifa
Posted 3 y ago
Responses: 4
3
3
0
Interesting how judges appointed by the orange boy continue to shoot down his supporters. I know he put them on the bench to do his bidding. How's that working out for you???
(3)
(0)
PO1 William "Chip" Nagel
SrA John Monette Their "Whataboutism" is Falling on Deaf Ears even with Trump Appointed Judges!
(0)
(0)
3
3
0
The guilty continue to distract, deflect and denigrate the fact tellers.
Rich
Rich
(3)
(0)
2
2
0
These people...smh.
The only thing possibly that could have had charges was the people involved in the Seattle CHOP. But even then they weren't trying to overthrow the government. They set up an attempted autonomous zone. It wasn't very smart - and there's conflicting reports that Barr talked about charging them with sedition but he denied it.
Otherwise anything with BLM was mostly peaceful. The things classified as violent riots were either outside agitators OR police escalating peaceful protests by attacking protesters.
The only thing possibly that could have had charges was the people involved in the Seattle CHOP. But even then they weren't trying to overthrow the government. They set up an attempted autonomous zone. It wasn't very smart - and there's conflicting reports that Barr talked about charging them with sedition but he denied it.
Otherwise anything with BLM was mostly peaceful. The things classified as violent riots were either outside agitators OR police escalating peaceful protests by attacking protesters.
(2)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google