Posted on Nov 15, 2021
Judge questions Rittenhouse gun charge, raising doubts about prosecution's case
1.17K
4
3
2
2
0
There are a LOT of miss understanding, assumptions about Wisconsin law and what crimes Rittenhouse committed. I assumed Rittenhouse had violated Wisconsin gun laws by carrying a gun as a 17 year old. It appears he may not have violated Wisconsin gun laws. Looks like the prosecution screwed up in not entering the gun Rittenhouse carried and used into evidence, not measuring the weapon and not fully understanding Wisconsin gun laws.
Judge questions Rittenhouse gun charge, raising doubts about prosecution's case
Posted from foxnews.com
Crime
Law
Judge
Edited 3 y ago
Posted 3 y ago
Responses: 3
1
1
0
I've been saying all along that I wasn't sure based on what I read about the law. But after each of the related sections of the law were cited and put into context, I absolutely agree with the Judge's decision. The spirit of the law was likely meant for underage hunters, but there is nothing specific which delineates between allowing them to have a long gun for personal protection or hunting. Regardless, the judge threw the charge out.
(1)
(0)
1
1
0
Suspended Profile
Was he a legal resident of that state allowed to carry a long gun if permitted or
allowed to bring into the state?
allowed to bring into the state?
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google