Posted on Sep 18, 2021
new-york-times-forced-to-correct-major-error-on-ivermectin
1.17K
18
5
5
5
0
Posted 3 y ago
Responses: 3
SGT (Join to see) the article is somewhat troubling because for even any number of people to injest this medication makes me wonder why numbers suggest the population percentages do not want to get vaccinated. Something is off with the information being circulated.
(2)
(0)
SGT (Join to see)
I have not been vaxed, also I haven't gone to the tack room and gotten in to the ivermectin for the equines. Every one in my house was really ill in February 2020, for about 10 days. Since that time we have taken no special precautions against covid, and we've all been fine. I see no reason, at all, to get a shot of something that continues to show differing adverse side affects within the population. Should I become ill later on, it's on me because of the choices I made.
(3)
(0)
You have got to remember that these are the same people who refuse to you percentages correctly in the first place, they often put up things like 300% when there is no such thing instead of saying it as it should be stated as 3 times more. I know they do it because 300% sounds way more dramatic than 3 times, I guess journalist don't care about being correct, as long as people are reading their crap.
(1)
(0)
They have forgotten it takes a big man to admit when they are wrong, and a bigger man to make amends.
(1)
(0)
Read This Next