Posted on Feb 6, 2021
Supreme Court to Consider 2020 Election Challenge Lawsuits in February Conference
704
15
6
6
6
0
Every time anyone mentions "election fraud" there is a community of deniers who scoff that there is no evidence, therefore no fraud, and point to the "failure" of all court cases. Whenever I rebut their contention stating that the cases were dismissed on procedural grounds without consideration of the evidence, they laugh at me. Well folks, it seems that he who laughs last may laugh best. I am not saying there was election fraud or that the evidence is compelling. I have merely stated that many (maybe half the voters) will not accept the validity of the 2020 election until they have a fair hearing. Is it not fair and just for them to have that hearing?
Supreme Court to Consider 2020 Election Challenge Lawsuits in February Conference
Posted from theepochtimes.comPosted in these groups: 
Election 2020
Election 2020
Posted 4 y ago
Responses: 3
6
6
0
I agree with you. Until the evidence is heard by justices, I have no reason to believe it isn't valid. Let's find out
(6)
(0)
1
1
0
“Whenever I rebut their contention stating that the cases were dismissed on procedural grounds without consideration of the evidence, they laugh at me.“
Why was this case dismissed?
https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/20422013/bowyer-v-ducey-dismissal-order.pdf
Why was this case dismissed?
https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/20422013/bowyer-v-ducey-dismissal-order.pdf
bowyer-v-ducey-dismissal-order.pdf
§JÝVhL8X25ÞHiüíX;V(6¶äÓ1Ûìií#þö[6VÜfL4ZYÃs0iuÐ~ÉÚ?ã.·yQNA9Í¿B8ë8 3·IªQÔ:aPø)é2mËÌs@1å&m`_mSóâÍÏHdvÒ8Hcýu*m|ùSpÔÚüh fZ:ùBK]-%Þì!F@lÛðò]ZÝQëtÙËðdÎÎ~ðwv6^#{hØöÜ6ô^jÚ^õÚ§Kz^7$ÞgÌ/KöïÑÅjîRð8á¶|jGÈ;äRÒ5gY04üzä1Ç@úÌd¶\üùÄÀ2sa«s;-Äò ö"uýÏÖndtZL«\æ ÐWæ!Ú$yZ,Öªi }eBnu32ÿ»f0rUÝåzòhXaå(ý3lt1pÌ\WF?wÕnµp;yxÌ,^åXkMÐádZZVåôXÀ*ÞËó2ÉHÕÇøë~eËÿΫZÅ:¿FjÐÁ}^TÎìo/Åíãli:iÜÝÝA+sóens;ܶã}îÓgGå=Ôï=e^ÍÝ &ÆÈfÜ}àëí2ÃßE$¶zêkõåªásUPYû[r¡]K9¿Õxô,µ lÓ;nNù"Ò!ÀhÛh7ëGàx~eüªò?XJ...
(1)
(0)
SGT (Join to see)
Capt Gregory Prickett - I know why it was dismissed. I was hoping CPT Jack would take a stab at it. I had a laugh track cued up.
My favorite part is on page 1. “Yet the Complaint’s allegations are sorely wanting of relevant or reliable evidence..”
My favorite part is on page 1. “Yet the Complaint’s allegations are sorely wanting of relevant or reliable evidence..”
(1)
(0)
CPT Jack Durish
SGT (Join to see) - Sorry, I can't hear you laughing over the din of Democrats celebrating President Biden's EO's...
(0)
(0)
SGT (Join to see)
CPT Jack Durish - sir, you failed to explain why the above case was dismissed.
Also, how are President Biden’s EOs relevant to this particular discussion?
Also, how are President Biden’s EOs relevant to this particular discussion?
(1)
(0)
0
0
0
Considering the potential outcome of these cases, should They decide to hear them, do You really think it would take until October?
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google