Court: Flash-Bang Grenades are Weapons of Mass Destruction

Capt Gregory Prickett I understand that's the NCSC's ruling and interpretation of the law. I'm interested in how the police in NC will now be able to justify the use of a WMD against citizens before any action of the citizen that justifies such force.

Good morning, I tend to agree with your assessment. Thanks for commenting.

Capt Gregory Prickett - Perhaps, esquire, you might work on reading comprehension first and stop running to your legal opinion tactic and pretend you have caught someone with a fancy, legally written 15 page court case. Yes, I did quote the DHS definition of a WMD but in the exact same sentence, one you were apparently to lazy to read (maybe playing checkers or something) I said:

"How a flash bang, whose intent is to cause disorientation/stun could be placed in the category of a WMD shows just how idiotic some or our lawmakers and our court systems are."

I acknowledged that lawmakers there in NC have different definition and that they have legislated it and are enforcing it there, duh. My comment is that the standard is ridiculous and that we have idiots in the legislature passing this sort of garbage. There is no one that knows anything about WMD's who would put a flashbang in a WMD law, yes/no? Take of your ambulance chaser hat and try to apply some common sense.