Posted on Nov 9, 2019
Republicans want Hunter Biden, Ukraine whistleblower as impeachment inquiry witnesses — Fox News
410
3
12
2
2
0
In otherwords GOP doesn’t care about the depositions of government officials chosen by Trump, Pompeo, or other Trump officials. They just want to smear Biden and the Whistleblower. What other reason do you demand to question a guy, Hunter Biden, that has never been employed by the US government and has zero knowledge of Trump’s phone calls nor the whistleblower complaint. Gaetz, Jordan and others just want to push the “Ukraine not Russia interfered in the 2016 election” conspiracy and connect it to the Biden family.
Republicans want Hunter Biden, Ukraine whistleblower as impeachment inquiry witnesses — Fox News
Posted from apple.newsPosted in these groups: 
Election 2020
Election 2020
Posted 5 y ago
Responses: 2
1
1
0
How do you extract Hunter Biden from all of this? It is part of what Trump was talking about to The Ukraine.
(1)
(0)
MAJ James Woods
So what questions do you ask Hunter Biden? He wasn’t on the phone call. He’s not employed by the US government at the time of the call. If this Investigation is about what Trump said, demanded, offered on the phone call and any instructions given to Giuliani, Sondland, Taylor, DoJ, and DoS; just what knowledge would Biden have? Oh wait. Cause the GOP don’t want to talk about whether Trump or any of his officials did anything wrong. They want to focus conspiracy theories. Like how LTC Vindman is a Russian-Ukrainian plant cause he speaks the language that makes him qualified to work as a FAO, Intel, SME on Ukrainian affairs for the NSC.
(0)
(0)
0
0
0
We have emails from Burisma seeking meetings with the State Department, Hunter Biden is specifically mentioned in the story I am posting. The prosecutor who was fired claims he was told to go easy when he started investigating Burisma, also mentioned was Joe Biden threatening to with hold aid was brought up, as was Hunter Biden being on the board of Burisma. Requests for email contacts between Hunter and the State Department are on going. Calling Hunter to testify isn’t unreasonable. There seems to be a smel of corruption around Burisma , and how Hunter family associations were leveraged. So was Trump asking for investigation of Hunter Biden and Burisma unwarranted?
https://thefederalist.com/2019/11/07/emails-reveal-burisma-consulting-firm-leveraged-hunter-biden-to-get-state-dept-meetings/
https://thefederalist.com/2019/11/07/emails-reveal-burisma-consulting-firm-leveraged-hunter-biden-to-get-state-dept-meetings/
Emails Reveal Burisma Consulting Firm Leveraged Hunter Biden To Get State Dept. Meetings
A letter to the State Department demands answers to questions about whether the Ukrainian gas company used Hunter Biden to access foreign policy officials.
(0)
(0)
LTC David Brown
Capt Gregory Prickett - I simply don’t agree bribery and extortion have been established. There will be a hearing and vote on impeachment, then a trial in the Senate, I believe people are innocent until proven guilty unless something has changed.
(0)
(0)
MAJ James Woods
LTC David Brown He did. In fact, even Congress was aware to the point that a bipartisan letter of support was signed by them endorsing the administration’s anti-corruption policy towards Ukraine. Note Congress was informed reason why any aid approved had terms. Note US was working with multiple foreign governments on this. There was no shadow government channels operating within the State Dept. So it’s laughable that you’re suggesting Biden didn’t use proper channels.
(0)
(0)
LTC David Brown
MAJ James Woods - So I guess it was Biden’s job to tell them they had six hours to fire the prosecutor or else lose the aid? Ok.
(0)
(0)
MAJ James Woods
LTC David Brown Sure. He was given the task to do so as VP. Pence or Barr would’ve been more qualifiers than Giuliani but I’m sure you have an excuse to justify his involvement.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google