Top diplomat Bill Taylor gives 'disturbing' testimony on Trump's Ukraine dealings, Democrats say

wrong again, Jack. The republicans were very present and given equal time for questions.

Easy for you to say as a Pres Bone Spurs supporter

There were at lest a dozen republicans in the room and there have been the same number in each testimony. The fact that the democrats are not allowing the republicans be involved in part of the process is fake news and a smear campaign being put out by the GOP.

SGT Anna Kleinschmidt - Name one witness that the Republicans have been able to call to testify.

The only opinions that matter from this point on are those handed down by the Courts. It's obvious the US and RP are divided, and in some cases that's due to being misinformed or even willfully inaccurate to support their opinion. Do a little research and stick to facts. Not liking the process is far different than saying the process is unlawful. One is opinion, the other fact. https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/25/politics/grand-jury-impeachment-mueller/index.html

Fox & Friends (disregard TYT after segment due to bias) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nInJdHuT8GI

MSgt Steve Sweeney - Barr didn't put any spin on the Mueller report. He asked Mueller point blank if there was any obstruction and Mueller answered 'No'. Barr published the Mueller report in full. Mueller report did not specify any crimes were committed. "...took a variety of actions... that raised questions about whether he had obstructed justice" does not equal "he obstructed justice". Who's reading into a statement what they want to hear?

Conclusion on page 187 of the same volume: "Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him." - Mueller's own words that his two year investigation did NOT conclude that the president committed a crime.

Didn't stop Starr from referring charges to the House - why did Mueller get weak-kneed? Perhaps because he never had a case to begin with? His entire report is speculation over whether anything done was truly improper or just questionable based on your point of view.

And you still have to the section you quoted to get to "he committed crimes". Don't you wonder why none of the impeachment hearings talking about Russia? Because everyone knows it was a hoax, and those that started the hoax are now going to be subpoenaed in a criminal investigation. My money's on Chris Steele singing like a canary. ALL of this will be fair game in a Senate trial, which is why it will never go there, IMO.

Time will tell and the truth will eventually come out.

MSgt Steve Sweeney - Correct - page 182 of the document, 187 of the .pdf file that includes intro, table of contents, etc.

MSgt Steve Sweeney - Steve, lay off the hooch a little. You are an angry drunk and it making you look a little unhinged. I know not picking up E9 was a blow for you but you will get past it. IT is time to move on and try to fins something you can actually follow all the way through on.

While there are no strict guidelines (and I did not say there were) I also know reading comprehension in one of those things that goes with inebriation. There is precedent and there is fairness to the target of an impeachment whether a judge or a president.

This is another con job by the democrats. They are breaking with precedent because they have no real high crimes or misdemeanors to pursue. If they did, they would have already put them forward. This is another fishing expedition (as was Mueller) and you will be as disappointed at the end of this as you were when you cried like a little bitch over the Mueller outcome.

These committees are not grand jury's. There is no comparison there at all. You keep pretending there is but there is not. I explained the difference, as usual you are only interested in an outcome to your liking not a process that is transparent, open and fair.

There would be no media circus if this were being done in the open as all 3 other impeachments of presidents have been done. You have been wrong at every turn on the Mueller investigation and every other "scandal" that has come down the pike just as you will be wrong here. The dems have enough votes in the house to impeach tomorrow if they wanted to do so. They may even do so. The senate will not remove him from office and you will be back at the bar yelling in a drunken rage at the other patrons...again.