Posted on Jul 12, 2018
Trey Gowdy vs Peter Strzok in EXPLOSIVE Exchange at House Oversight Hearing on anti-Trump Texts
1.53K
7
2
6
6
0
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 2
1) He wanted us to believe that he didn't remember writing the texts, but he could very explicitly explain the reasoning behind each one....
2) He wanted us to believe that his personal political beliefs had no bearing on his professional work. It sure looked like he was combative and a@@holish towards every Republican, but fawning and smiling at every Democrat. In case he didn't know it, that hearing was a professional engagement, and he certainly didn't show that he could separate the personal from the professional.
Pretty sure things will not end well for him....
2) He wanted us to believe that his personal political beliefs had no bearing on his professional work. It sure looked like he was combative and a@@holish towards every Republican, but fawning and smiling at every Democrat. In case he didn't know it, that hearing was a professional engagement, and he certainly didn't show that he could separate the personal from the professional.
Pretty sure things will not end well for him....
(1)
(0)
I found it interesting that he commented his texts also involved criticisms of Bernie Sanders but they were not made public with the anti-trump texts. That kind of casts his texts in a different light and again reinforces my theory they were really office banter more than they were serious. Honestly, for as much as this guy claimed he could do in text, I really doubt any single FBI Agent has that kind of power. And the claim that three or more agents that were anti-trump referred to one single meeting. Sorry but a single meeting does not make a conspiracy, you need a series of meetings where the topic of the meeting is the conspiracy. So more and more this scandal is looking overblown and political to me. I do agree he should be sanctioned though for expressing a political opinion in regards to work so many times to other employees, that part was wrong and should be against FBI internal policy.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next