Posted on Nov 28, 2017
Why Trump keeps calling Elizabeth Warren "Pocahontas"
2.04K
42
23
7
7
0
Posted 7 y ago
Responses: 6
This is his way of reminding her that she is a liar and reminding the public that she is ... a liar.. This is not an Insult to native Americans.. More to the point the fact that she claimed indigenous status and used it to get promoted and get opportunity's and doors opened should be offensive to Native Americans. She is a scam artists that used them to get ahead.
Why is that not the story?
She has not even attempted to confirm her "family lore" stories that she is Cherokee and even a group of Cherokees have asked her to prove her claims beyond family stories. With the easy access to DNA companies that give you results in weeks. But THATS not the story, no the main stream media would have you believe Trump is just name calling and being mean.
Then again this is the same Media that demanded Sarah Huckabee Sanders cook her pecan pie on youtube to "prove" she isn't lying about making it....
Liberalism is a Mental disorder and we need a cure.
Why is that not the story?
She has not even attempted to confirm her "family lore" stories that she is Cherokee and even a group of Cherokees have asked her to prove her claims beyond family stories. With the easy access to DNA companies that give you results in weeks. But THATS not the story, no the main stream media would have you believe Trump is just name calling and being mean.
Then again this is the same Media that demanded Sarah Huckabee Sanders cook her pecan pie on youtube to "prove" she isn't lying about making it....
Liberalism is a Mental disorder and we need a cure.
(8)
(0)
CPO (Join to see)
MAJ Bryan Zeski - How many other Politicians didn't serve or dodged the draft in some way? I don't see anyone complaining on the left about Bill Clinton not serving and he did use every loop hole and connection to get out of it, HRC didn't volunteer, or Dennis Kucinich who had a medical exemption for the Vietnam draft. Bill Richardson received student and medical classifications during the Vietnam draft. The list goes on and on, and its on both sides of the aisle, so they didn't want to get shot at or risk death, be honest it takes a special kind of person to do the job we do. They all found a "legal" way out. We might not approve but that's the way the system works.
He Lied... Where you upset with "I did not have sexual relations with that women" or "No I never sent or received classified documents on my Private serve", OR "No I don't have a private server" or "Trump didn't pay any taxes"
Do you believe the sales man when he says the car is worth 30K? Do you call him a liar? OR do you negotiate a deal?
ALL politicians and Business men lie, The DNC even used it as a viable defense in court "Campaign promises are not binding" DNC vs SANDERS. This is why I didn't get into sales or become a politician. Every one has an angle, some use the bluff, some use the law, some use the system, some straight up lie. But everyone is looking to improve their odds and chances to achieve their goals.
As for the "he got rich" so did his investors, do you think the people he employees are mad that he is rich or are they happy they have jobs and can feed their families. I once read a story (read below) that really sums up how I feel about the Rich or those that choose to spend (invest) their money.
"A guy looked at my Corvette the other day and said, “I wonder how many people could have been fed for the money that sports car cost?”
I replied, “I am not sure. It fed a lot of families in Bowling Green, Kentucky who built it. It fed the people who make the tires. It fed the people who made the components that went into it. It fed the people in the copper mine who mined the copper for the wires. It fed people in Decatur, Illinois at Caterpillar who make the trucks that haul the copper ore. It fed the trucking people who hauled it from the plant to the dealer and fed the people working at the dealership and their families. BUT... I have to admit, I guess I really don't know how many people it fed.”
That is the difference between capitalism and welfare mentality. When you buy something, you put money in people's pockets, and give them dignity for their skills.
When you give someone something for nothing, you rob them of their dignity and self-worth."
I don't begrudge the Rich, and anyone that says they don't like money I will call a liar to their face. Trump made his money using the system in place. If you hate how he got Rich then you should leave America because it was using the Americas system that got him Rich.
Try again MAJ.
He Lied... Where you upset with "I did not have sexual relations with that women" or "No I never sent or received classified documents on my Private serve", OR "No I don't have a private server" or "Trump didn't pay any taxes"
Do you believe the sales man when he says the car is worth 30K? Do you call him a liar? OR do you negotiate a deal?
ALL politicians and Business men lie, The DNC even used it as a viable defense in court "Campaign promises are not binding" DNC vs SANDERS. This is why I didn't get into sales or become a politician. Every one has an angle, some use the bluff, some use the law, some use the system, some straight up lie. But everyone is looking to improve their odds and chances to achieve their goals.
As for the "he got rich" so did his investors, do you think the people he employees are mad that he is rich or are they happy they have jobs and can feed their families. I once read a story (read below) that really sums up how I feel about the Rich or those that choose to spend (invest) their money.
"A guy looked at my Corvette the other day and said, “I wonder how many people could have been fed for the money that sports car cost?”
I replied, “I am not sure. It fed a lot of families in Bowling Green, Kentucky who built it. It fed the people who make the tires. It fed the people who made the components that went into it. It fed the people in the copper mine who mined the copper for the wires. It fed people in Decatur, Illinois at Caterpillar who make the trucks that haul the copper ore. It fed the trucking people who hauled it from the plant to the dealer and fed the people working at the dealership and their families. BUT... I have to admit, I guess I really don't know how many people it fed.”
That is the difference between capitalism and welfare mentality. When you buy something, you put money in people's pockets, and give them dignity for their skills.
When you give someone something for nothing, you rob them of their dignity and self-worth."
I don't begrudge the Rich, and anyone that says they don't like money I will call a liar to their face. Trump made his money using the system in place. If you hate how he got Rich then you should leave America because it was using the Americas system that got him Rich.
Try again MAJ.
(3)
(0)
MAJ Bryan Zeski
SPC Jeff Daley, PhD - Where's the proof that POTUS sexually assaulted women? He admitted it. He said it on tape. What else do you need? How much more authoritative can it get than a personal admission? How some people manage to do the mental gymnastics to make him seem like a decent human is Olympic medal material.
To take your UCMJ comment. If I had a Soldier, on tape, saying what POTUS said, on tape, he would be found guilty. Wouldn't you find that Soldier guilty?
Or were you talking about the business transactions? Or the bone spurs? I forget which "allegations" we're talking about sometimes - there are so many.
And hey, we can at least agree on this, "Hatred is not an excuse for this activity as its an emotion, driving an opinion, and usually not based on fact." I'd like to see POTUS step up and practice it more often.
CPO (Join to see) - I love how anytime there is a point made about POTUS using his family money and influence to not be drafted, it turns into a "well, they did it too! So it's ok!" argument. Bottom line. It's not ok. It's not ok for them. It's not ok for him. Can we agree on that? Or are you so insistent that because others were also bad, it excuses the bad behavior of POTUS in the past? Where is the personal responsibility and integrity in that? Should I go on a rant about the Clinton's and their lack of service? I could. And about many others also - but they aren't currently in a leadership role in the country, so it's kind of pointless. I could also go on and on about my draft dodging neighbor, but who cares about him? He's not in a position of power and responsibility. Do I hold someone who is currently in charge of the nation to a slightly higher standard than my neighbor? Yes. And so should everyone else.
Did Clinton lie? Yes. I never defended him. And it's 100% irrelevant to POTUS unless you're trying to excuse POTUS with Clinton's behavior and lies.
Does it not upset you in the least that POTUS lied and cheated his way through business dealing in order to make more money for his investors? That's OK to you? He intentionally let businesses go bankrupt and intentionally didn't pay people who worked for him because he made more money for him and his "investors" that way. That's BS and you know it. He intentionally had people do work at an agreed price and then, when the work was done, refused to pay and tried to negotiate the price down. That's BS and you know it.
I am always amazed when people can defend POTUS blatantly immoral actions in business by saying other people did it too.
Now, take your scenario about the Corvette and who it fed, but instead of buying the Corvette, the guy stole it from someone else. Someone else bought it first, and fed those people. Then this guy comes along, says he'll buy it, takes it for a test drive and never comes back. And then, when the guy who actually OWNS the car says, "Hey! Where my car?" the thief says, "Umm, I won't give it back, but I'll maybe give you half of what you asked for and I agreed to, ok?" The guy says, "No!" But, the guy who stole the car has a bunch of lawyers and can afford to keep things tied up in court MUCH longer than the guy who owns the car - so, instead, the guy who owned the car settles for less and the thief calls it "good negotiation skills."
I never advocated for welfare - I advocated that the businessman Trump was dishonest in his business dealings on a regular basis and that he ended up knowingly screwing people out of pay that they earned while he employed them.
And you think I should leave America because the system is able to be manipulated and influenced by people with little to no moral standards? I think the system in America is pretty decent and it helps a lot of honest people make an honest living and gives them the opportunity to build themselves up. I also think that it is able to be abused by people with power and money in order to gain more power and money dishonestly.
How about some nice easy questions for you - do you think that Businessman Trump acted in good faith in his business dealings? Was he a moral and ethical businessman?
To take your UCMJ comment. If I had a Soldier, on tape, saying what POTUS said, on tape, he would be found guilty. Wouldn't you find that Soldier guilty?
Or were you talking about the business transactions? Or the bone spurs? I forget which "allegations" we're talking about sometimes - there are so many.
And hey, we can at least agree on this, "Hatred is not an excuse for this activity as its an emotion, driving an opinion, and usually not based on fact." I'd like to see POTUS step up and practice it more often.
CPO (Join to see) - I love how anytime there is a point made about POTUS using his family money and influence to not be drafted, it turns into a "well, they did it too! So it's ok!" argument. Bottom line. It's not ok. It's not ok for them. It's not ok for him. Can we agree on that? Or are you so insistent that because others were also bad, it excuses the bad behavior of POTUS in the past? Where is the personal responsibility and integrity in that? Should I go on a rant about the Clinton's and their lack of service? I could. And about many others also - but they aren't currently in a leadership role in the country, so it's kind of pointless. I could also go on and on about my draft dodging neighbor, but who cares about him? He's not in a position of power and responsibility. Do I hold someone who is currently in charge of the nation to a slightly higher standard than my neighbor? Yes. And so should everyone else.
Did Clinton lie? Yes. I never defended him. And it's 100% irrelevant to POTUS unless you're trying to excuse POTUS with Clinton's behavior and lies.
Does it not upset you in the least that POTUS lied and cheated his way through business dealing in order to make more money for his investors? That's OK to you? He intentionally let businesses go bankrupt and intentionally didn't pay people who worked for him because he made more money for him and his "investors" that way. That's BS and you know it. He intentionally had people do work at an agreed price and then, when the work was done, refused to pay and tried to negotiate the price down. That's BS and you know it.
I am always amazed when people can defend POTUS blatantly immoral actions in business by saying other people did it too.
Now, take your scenario about the Corvette and who it fed, but instead of buying the Corvette, the guy stole it from someone else. Someone else bought it first, and fed those people. Then this guy comes along, says he'll buy it, takes it for a test drive and never comes back. And then, when the guy who actually OWNS the car says, "Hey! Where my car?" the thief says, "Umm, I won't give it back, but I'll maybe give you half of what you asked for and I agreed to, ok?" The guy says, "No!" But, the guy who stole the car has a bunch of lawyers and can afford to keep things tied up in court MUCH longer than the guy who owns the car - so, instead, the guy who owned the car settles for less and the thief calls it "good negotiation skills."
I never advocated for welfare - I advocated that the businessman Trump was dishonest in his business dealings on a regular basis and that he ended up knowingly screwing people out of pay that they earned while he employed them.
And you think I should leave America because the system is able to be manipulated and influenced by people with little to no moral standards? I think the system in America is pretty decent and it helps a lot of honest people make an honest living and gives them the opportunity to build themselves up. I also think that it is able to be abused by people with power and money in order to gain more power and money dishonestly.
How about some nice easy questions for you - do you think that Businessman Trump acted in good faith in his business dealings? Was he a moral and ethical businessman?
(2)
(0)
MAJ Bryan Zeski
SPC Jeff Daley, PhD - His continuous and unrelenting personal attacks on people are founded in his hatred or extreme dislike for them. He can't go a week without spouting off about it. If his issues we're professional and not personal, I'd say there's a valid argument, but continual ad hominem attacks are not based in any professional disagreement.
(2)
(0)
This woman has lied and cheated her way to the top. POTUS was to kind at what he called her - I would have used much stronger language.
(3)
(0)
MAJ Bryan Zeski
Aren't they essentially one in the same when it comes to integrity in their careers?
(0)
(0)
MSG Jay Jackson
Well I am sure she didn’t do any couch interviews. So she made it to the top some how.
(0)
(0)
SSG (Join to see)
How ironic in the same posting you accuse Warren of lying and cheating while defending a liar and a cheater. If Trump had a Disney movie it would be called the Lying King. He's a lying sack of shit. Y'all can tap dance around the truth all you want but he is what he is.
(0)
(0)
Here is the background on Fauxcahontas. https://www.npr.org/sections/itsallpolitics/2012/05/09/151784645/in-mass-senate-race-warren-on-defense-over-native-american-heritage
In Mass. Senate Race, Warren On The Defensive Over Native American Heritage
Democrat Elizabeth Warren says that when she was growing up in Oklahoma, her family always told her that she's part Cherokee. A genealogist has found a record indicating Warren is 1/32 Native American. Some critics are insinuating she may have used her heritage to advance her career.
(2)
(0)
LTC (Join to see)
My wife received her Ancestry.com analysis and she was 1% Mali. So using Liberal logic she can claim that she is an African American.
(1)
(0)
Read This Next