Avatar feed
Responses: 5
PFC Jonathan Albano
2
2
0
Wonder what idiot made that decision. A moving target is harder to hit than a stationary one. Good way to get a top official or two killed in a wartime scenario.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Aircraft Pneudraulics Repairer
2
2
0
Hopefully Congress will override that decision. I mean how much are you actually saving anyway? The benefits far outweigh the cost.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
Lt Col John (Jack) Christensen
2
2
0
Dumber than dirt comes to mind. Know this administration thinks costs for new AF1 are exhorbinate but cutting in-flight refueling capability just shows how out of touch with reality they are.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close