0
0
0
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 3
"Having" a nuke and "using" a nuke are two different things. For a lot of nations, the "having" part is deterrent enough or leverage enough for their local business. Case in point being India and Pakistan. It is debatable whether or not either country could survive its own weapons launches. But - when your target is one rickshaw away, that hardly matters. Same with North Korea. They will talk nuke, play nuke and basically throw a parade full of trucks towing "nuke like" objects on them (covered with a silver shroud to add to the bullshit) but its highly unlikely that little Kim could hurt anyone other than a few peasants unlucky enough to be under the big-dong-II (or whatever name it is...) when it falls back to its pad during launch and detonates.
(2)
(0)
Nuclear weapons were inevitable. Even if you eliminated them all tonight, somebody could start building more at any moment in the future.
(1)
(0)
Read This Next