Posted on May 4, 2017
PO3 Business Advisement
PO3 PO3 (Join to see)
5.01K
186
55
9
9
0
Posted >1 y ago
Avatar feed
Responses: 24
LTC Orlando Illi
13
13
0
LTC
Edited >1 y ago
Posted >1 y ago
9e2c3d02
(13)
Comment
(0)
PO3 Business Advisement
PO3 (Join to see)
>1 y
Stunningly true.
(2)
Reply
(0)
TSgt Ray Rock
TSgt Ray Rock
>1 y
If she were charged there’s no telling what the investigation and trial would reveal. My guess is that this was swept under the rug because many highly placed people would be implicated for many serious breaches of security. And they wanted to keep that from getting out.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Michael Eastes
8
8
0
SSG
Posted >1 y ago
Laws are for little people. Any of us who ever held a security clearance of any level know what would have happened to us if we had so much as mislaid an item, never mind doing what these people did. Our "betters" must be free of such petty distractions.
(8)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
MCPO Roger Collins
6
6
0
MCPO
Posted >1 y ago
I suppose the same as Hillary, lack of intent to do anything with it. But, more likely, a deal was made somewhere. Where are you, AG Sessions?
(6)
Comment
(0)
MSgt George Cater
MSgt George Cater
>1 y
Lack of intent (surely you know) doesn't have jack squat to do with guilt in this case.
(2)
Reply
(0)
Sgt John Steinmeier
Sgt John Steinmeier
>1 y
Especially when there is no "intent" requirement in the elements of the Federal Law broken.
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Read This Next
RallyPoint Home

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

Log In
© RallyPoint Networks, Inc 2024

RallyPoint is not affiliated with DoD
close

Welcome to RallyPoint!

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy I'm a civilian Supporter