Posted on Dec 17, 2016
No record of ‘faithless elector' Chris Suprun as a 9/11 first responder
5.69K
8
4
3
3
0
Some food for thought. Regardless of his actions when he casts his vote in the electoral college, the fact that a political party ( in this case the Republicans) selected someone without vetting them shows that they don't really give a shit about the character of the person, as long as they pull the lever for the candidate they are supposed to.
In this case it bit them in the ass. Suprun appears to be a pathological liar about what he's done who can't pay his bills. He likes the limelight. @
In this case it bit them in the ass. Suprun appears to be a pathological liar about what he's done who can't pay his bills. He likes the limelight. @
No record of ‘faithless elector' Chris Suprun as a 9/11 first responder
Posted from wfaa.com
Republicans
Democrats
Election 2016
Posted 8 y ago
Responses: 4
1
1
0
just another Poser... No Different than The Military... I hope they hang him out to dry
(1)
(0)
1
1
0
Interesting article. When I voted for my choices of electors there were almost none who's name I recognized. And I live in a small community. Our trust is in the "establishment" to select honorable citizens to vote faithfully. If anyone does not, their names should be publicized and thrown out of the party. If they aren't honorable, it's apparent they belong in the Democrat Party.
(1)
(0)
1
1
0
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google