Posted on Dec 13, 2016
Julian Assange associate: It was a leak, not a hack and the DNC insider is NOT Russian
12.2K
58
32
8
8
0
Try as they may, there is no way to sweep the information under the rug. This is not about who gave the info to the public, this is about the crimes and the fraud that was brought to light because of the leaks. The political class and the media are trying to divert our focus away from the crime and onto the people who reported the crime.
Julian Assange associate: It was a leak, not a hack and the DNC insider is NOT Russian
Posted from bizpacreview.comPosted in these groups: 
Hacking
Democrats
Republicans
Political Correctness
Office of the President (POTUS)
Hacking Democrats Republicans Political Correctness Office of the President (POTUS)
Posted 8 y ago
Responses: 12
7
7
0
Too date, Wikileaks has never had to retract a leak because it was false. So I would say he has a better track record than any reporter or news agency out there, making his opinions matter. The left used to praise him when the leaks he reviled hurt the right and now the dismiss him, funny. Yes I know the right would do the same.
(7)
(0)
SSG (Join to see)
Wikileaks isn't pro-left or pro-right... it's anti-US and pro-Russian. Selectively sharing true information is the best possible way to present a distorted picture of reality.
(1)
(0)
6
6
0
I believe it has always been an inside job. Of course they have to TRY and pin the blame on someone, or why not the Russians or Chinese or even the Man in the Moon. Anyone but themselves.
(6)
(0)
6
6
0
From the article ...
"“As Julian Assange has made crystal clear, the leaks did not come from the Russians. As I have explained countless times, they are not hacks, they are insider leaks – there is a major difference between the two,” he wrote. “And it should be said again and again, that if Hillary Clinton had not connived with the DNC to fix the primary schedule to disadvantage Bernie, if she had not received advance notice of live debate questions to use against Bernie, if she had not accepted massive donations to the Clinton foundation and family members in return for foreign policy influence, if she had not failed to distance herself from some very weird and troubling people, then none of this would have happened.”
Dirt is dirt ... no matter who sweeps it out into the open. Whether it comes via the Russians and WikiLeaks (though WikiLeaks denies the Russians as the source), from a DNC insider, or via the New York Times ... it is still night soil ... and it still stinks.
"“As Julian Assange has made crystal clear, the leaks did not come from the Russians. As I have explained countless times, they are not hacks, they are insider leaks – there is a major difference between the two,” he wrote. “And it should be said again and again, that if Hillary Clinton had not connived with the DNC to fix the primary schedule to disadvantage Bernie, if she had not received advance notice of live debate questions to use against Bernie, if she had not accepted massive donations to the Clinton foundation and family members in return for foreign policy influence, if she had not failed to distance herself from some very weird and troubling people, then none of this would have happened.”
Dirt is dirt ... no matter who sweeps it out into the open. Whether it comes via the Russians and WikiLeaks (though WikiLeaks denies the Russians as the source), from a DNC insider, or via the New York Times ... it is still night soil ... and it still stinks.
(6)
(0)
Cpl Joshua Caldwell
Yep, the problem with being a criminal is that your crimes eventually get exposed, blaming the people who expose you is nothing more than a diversion. That is why HRC lost the election. She has no integrity and a long paper trail.
(1)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google