8
8
0
Let it be known that I do not nor have I ever liked Charles Krauthammer.
That being said, I can't be mad at his decision. It was concise, thoughtful, and consistent with his beliefs and, most importantly I felt, not laced with the vitriol that is often synonymous with this campaign
That being said, I can't be mad at his decision. It was concise, thoughtful, and consistent with his beliefs and, most importantly I felt, not laced with the vitriol that is often synonymous with this campaign
Charles Krauthammer: My vote, explained
Posted from stltoday.com
Hillary Clinton
Donald Trump
Media
Election 2016
Posted 8 y ago
Responses: 12
6
6
0
Charles Krauthammer missed two very important points. First, a bribe doesn't have to be accepted to be illegal. The offer to give something of value in exchange for an illegal act is a bribe. "Quid pro quo" has been a canard masking the seriousness of the crime. The second thing is that writing in the name of someone who hasn't a ghost of a chance of winning is no vote at all. The next President will be either Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton. (At this point, I don't know which it will be and regardless of the winner, the day after the election must mark the beginning of the rebirth of both major parties or We the People will be surrendering our nation) Now if Krauthammer (or anyone else) doesn't want to vote, that is perfectly okay. We have a right not a duty to vote.
(6)
(0)
PO1 Don Gulizia
I think if Trump wins both parties will take a serious look at their “business practices.” However, if Clinton wins, democrats will double down on this winning formula. What most fail to realize is that the reason there is a “Trump” is because of politicians like “Clinton.” This has to change. I’m voting for Trump..not because I believe he is any better than Clinton, but because it should bring about change and give us citizens a voice again. Plus, while I’m 90% sure Trump will be a lousy president…I’m 99.9% sure Clinton will be absolutely horrible. (Just my opinion, so no need to argue that point.)
(2)
(0)
5
5
0
Surprisingly unoffensive. Normally, when Krauthammer speaks, I cringe. But since Trump has entered the race, it's like Krauthammer has said to himself, "Holy Shit. We've made a monster. Time to back off."
(5)
(0)
SGT Damaso V Santana
He did not make that monsters, he is the most objective journalist in the nation. Nothing new here, we are all aware of her criminality and lies, the other one is worthless.
(1)
(0)
3
3
0
Something about his last name and me being ethnic German (ha-ha, just kidding). Anyways, I think he is usually a calm and measured voice. It could be the shrink training.
(3)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google