Would you consider HRC unfit to be a presidential candidate regardless of party affiliation?

LTC Private RallyPoint Member — Thu, 28 Jul 2016 16:59:20 -0400

Response by SFC Craig Dalen made Jul 28 at 2016 5:00 PM

SFC Craig Dalen — Thu, 28 Jul 2016 17:00:21 -0400

Yes I would

Response by SP5 Private RallyPoint Member made Jul 28 at 2016 5:00 PM

SP5 Private RallyPoint Member — Thu, 28 Jul 2016 17:00:22 -0400

LTC Private RallyPoint Member YES! Proven liar is enough to disqualify her from local dog catcher.

Response by SGT Private RallyPoint Member made Jul 28 at 2016 5:00 PM

SGT Private RallyPoint Member — Thu, 28 Jul 2016 17:00:43 -0400

No. Trump is unfit.

Response by SGT Jerrold Pesz made Jul 28 at 2016 5:05 PM

SGT Jerrold Pesz — Thu, 28 Jul 2016 17:05:10 -0400

I consider HRC to be scum of the earth no matter what party she belongs to.

Response by MSG Stan Hutchison made Jul 28 at 2016 5:09 PM

MSG Stan Hutchison — Thu, 28 Jul 2016 17:09:07 -0400

I believe she is the most qualified candidate on the ballot.

Response by SN Greg Wright made Jul 28 at 2016 5:10 PM

SN Greg Wright — Thu, 28 Jul 2016 17:10:48 -0400

She broke the law, is careless, and got Americans killed. She IS unfit, no matter how she labels herself.

Response by Capt Seid Waddell made Jul 28 at 2016 5:18 PM

Capt Seid Waddell — Thu, 28 Jul 2016 17:18:45 -0400

Yes. She has bad judgment, doesn't tell the truth, blames all of her failures on others, and she shows contempt for the military and the police. Plus, none of her decisions or foreign policies have succeeded and most have made a bad situation worse.

Mighty thin resume, that.

Response by SFC Stephen King made Jul 28 at 2016 5:20 PM

SFC Stephen King — Thu, 28 Jul 2016 17:20:44 -0400

LTC Private RallyPoint Member Yes I would

Response by CPT Private RallyPoint Member made Jul 28 at 2016 5:22 PM

CPT Private RallyPoint Member — Thu, 28 Jul 2016 17:22:11 -0400

Yes

Response by MCPO Roger Collins made Jul 28 at 2016 5:24 PM

MCPO Roger Collins — Thu, 28 Jul 2016 17:24:58 -0400

When you consider her husband and all the misogyny with Hillary following behind with a shovel to clean up and all the other scandals revealed about them, not in a million years. Electing a first black (well, bi-racial) and a crooked, lying incompetent female is more important to the left than the future of our formerly great nation. Surely there is a Reagan or Maggie Thatcher out there somewhere.

Response by TSgt Private RallyPoint Member made Jul 28 at 2016 5:32 PM

TSgt Private RallyPoint Member — Thu, 28 Jul 2016 17:32:29 -0400

Does the Pope wear a funny hat?

Response by Sgt Aaron Kennedy, MS made Jul 28 at 2016 5:39 PM

Sgt Aaron Kennedy, MS — Thu, 28 Jul 2016 17:39:49 -0400

Let's look at this like we would any other JOB

We must consider a few things:

1) "Professional Qualifications" aka Resume
2) "History" and "Performance"
3) "References" and "Associations"

On 1), she has a solid resume. She has filled a variety of billets, including Senator (Legislator) and Secretary of State (Diplomat). Additionally, she is intimately familiar with the Executive Branch, having been located "within it" for 8 years. I am not speaking of the "quality" of the service, merely "quantity."

On 2), we get into "quality" issues. This is a dead horse.

On 3), we get into more "quality" issues. Another dead horse.

That said, look at the current batch of candidates and who would you be willing to hire if it was any other job. If 1,2,3 act as "disqualifiers" then the choices become simple.

Response by SGT Damaso V Santana made Jul 28 at 2016 5:44 PM

SGT Damaso V Santana — Thu, 28 Jul 2016 17:44:46 -0400

A Liar, Americans killed on her watch, Hubby piles up $$$$$ while the Russians get 25% of our Strategic Uranium Reserve and she was Sec State, no charges brought for having God knows what on her personal server, classified emails. Well, I would not only consider her to be unfit, I would consider her to be a Traitor.
I wonder why all the demorats are so concerned about the possibility that the Russians may look at her email, maybe even publish some. Of course, all we would get, would be her yoga schedules, cookies recipes, and trivial family conversations...right hillary...hillary!...HILLARY!!!!!!

Response by SFC Jim Ruether made Jul 28 at 2016 6:07 PM

SFC Jim Ruether — Thu, 28 Jul 2016 18:07:57 -0400

Most definitely Yes! She has broken the law on numerous occasions. The FBI has said so. Whether she intended to do so is not relevant here. Maybe I am short of cash one day and I rob a convenience store on the spur of the moment. Can I use the same defense as she did. Well when I was in the store I had no intention of robbing it but it happened? I never intended to do it? My example is just as ridiculous as her supposed defense. Whether she knew she was breaking the law or not she still broke it. Ignorance of the law is no defense! She had to have been coached by others in the state department on what was allowed and what wasn't? She also had numerous staffers who could have intervened and warned her of her violation of the law.

Response by CMSgt Mike Esser made Jul 28 at 2016 6:13 PM

CMSgt Mike Esser — Thu, 28 Jul 2016 18:13:47 -0400

yes

Response by CPT Jack Durish made Jul 28 at 2016 6:32 PM

CPT Jack Durish — Thu, 28 Jul 2016 18:32:30 -0400

Hillary Clinton has disqualified herself by violating several federal statutes including U.S. Code Title 18, Part 1, Chapter 101, Section 2071, Paragraph b which states: "Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States." The Director of the FBI has already testified before Congress that while investigating Hillary's use of an unauthorized email server they determined that she had deleted thousands of work-related emails and, thus, did you return them in compliance with this statute. All we need now is someone with the courage to file the charges and prosecute Hillary for violating this statute and the others.

Response by PO1 Michael Fullmer made Jul 28 at 2016 6:35 PM

PO1 Michael Fullmer — Thu, 28 Jul 2016 18:35:53 -0400

Simply put...YES.

Response by PO1 John Miller made Jul 28 at 2016 6:36 PM

PO1 John Miller — Thu, 28 Jul 2016 18:36:42 -0400

The moment she compromised classified information she became unfit.

Response by MSgt Private RallyPoint Member made Jul 28 at 2016 7:05 PM

MSgt Private RallyPoint Member — Thu, 28 Jul 2016 19:05:29 -0400

She is unfit to be human!

Response by SPC Ken Sawyer made Jul 28 at 2016 7:10 PM

SPC Ken Sawyer — Thu, 28 Jul 2016 19:10:03 -0400

yes anyone that doesn't take human intel seriously can't be trusted with she has proven how sloppy she is and that can get our operators killed

Response by MSgt Private RallyPoint Member made Jul 28 at 2016 7:13 PM

MSgt Private RallyPoint Member — Thu, 28 Jul 2016 19:13:20 -0400

Yes, she isn't qualified to run a laundromat.

Response by LT Charles Baird made Jul 28 at 2016 7:13 PM

LT Charles Baird — Thu, 28 Jul 2016 19:13:33 -0400

Both candidates are unfit to be president

Response by CSM William DeWolf made Jul 28 at 2016 7:44 PM

CSM William DeWolf — Thu, 28 Jul 2016 19:44:20 -0400

Absolutely guilty, a liar,etc. she has a lot to cover up and can't understand why people are supporting her!

Response by Cpl Private RallyPoint Member made Jul 28 at 2016 8:11 PM

Cpl Private RallyPoint Member — Thu, 28 Jul 2016 20:11:48 -0400

The short and long answer... YES and a resounding YES!

Response by Capt Michael Greene made Jul 28 at 2016 8:55 PM

Capt Michael Greene — Thu, 28 Jul 2016 20:55:29 -0400

The most vetted person on the planet. Subjected to more politically-motivated investigations than anyone in history, yet never found in violation of any law. She took the nation's hardest job in terrible times, and kept the world together when every force domestic and foreign were fighting her. There is no one more qualified for the office, more familiar with the players, or more knowledgeable of the world. Then, of course, there is the alternative, the man who embarrasses conservatives and alienates leaders all over the world. The man who hasn't read a book in decades and only knows how to bilk investors and contractors to his benefit. So, yeah. Hillary is it.

Response by LTC Private RallyPoint Member made Jul 28 at 2016 9:04 PM

LTC Private RallyPoint Member — Thu, 28 Jul 2016 21:04:42 -0400

No.

Response by Alan K. made Jul 28 at 2016 10:38 PM

Alan K. — Thu, 28 Jul 2016 22:38:09 -0400

Let me think about that for a NY second........Yup

Response by Capt Jesse Hulgan made Jul 29 at 2016 2:50 AM

Capt Jesse Hulgan — Fri, 29 Jul 2016 02:50:28 -0400

She sent and received Top Secret/SAR via unsecured server. Any disclosure of TS will cause "grave harm" to national security. If you accept FBI Director Comey's judgement, she is grossly incompetent. She should never again have access to any classified information, and should never be allowed to hold a position of trust with any federal agency.

Response by SGM Tim Kinsella made Aug 4 at 2016 4:50 PM

SGM Tim Kinsella — Thu, 04 Aug 2016 16:50:45 -0400

I think this is going to be an election between the lesser of two evils.

Response by LT David Finke made Aug 4 at 2016 6:15 PM

LT David Finke — Thu, 04 Aug 2016 18:15:12 -0400

Yes. She would excelerate the push toward socialism. This would be a fatal mistake for the Republic. All attempts to make a socialist country work have failed over the last century. Why do we want to go there?